IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Poll: pure SCRAM versa SCRAM-as-GS2

Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@isode.com> Tue, 17 February 2009 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 020553A6C1C for <ietfarch-sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:47:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gLWWXHQfsnZV for <ietfarch-sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:47:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A87063A6BFD for <sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:47:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1HGfvw3095285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:41:58 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n1HGfvJA095284; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:41:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n1HGfkDc095276 for <ietf-sasl@imc.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:41:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from Kurt.Zeilenga@Isode.com)
Received: from [172.16.2.146] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <SZroxwB0lLH9@rufus.isode.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:41:44 +0000
Cc: SASL WG <ietf-sasl@imc.org>
Message-Id: <FD09C1F9-3155-457D-AD65-955D31197256@Isode.com>
From: Kurt Zeilenga <Kurt.Zeilenga@isode.com>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <498B569C.7070400@isode.com>
Subject: Re: Poll: pure SCRAM versa SCRAM-as-GS2
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 08:41:40 -0800
References: <498B569C.7070400@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-sasl/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-sasl.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-sasl-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

The chairs plan on making some evaluation of this question within the  
next few days.

If you haven't commented already, please now state your opinion.

-- Kurt

On Feb 5, 2009, at 1:14 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:

>
> Folks,
> I would like to solicit feedback from people regarding the choice  
> between 2 SCRAM versions:
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-newman-auth-scram-08.txt
> and
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-newman-auth-scram-gs2-00.txt
>
> You can use the following URL to see changes between them:
> http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-newman-auth-scram-08.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-newman-auth-scram-gs2-00.txt
>
> Please send your opinion on which version you prefer (and a short  
> explanation of why) to the mailing list, or say if you need more  
> information.
>
> I would like to get all answers before February 19th, please.
>
> Regards,
> Alexey
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email