IETF Logo Mail Archive

Poll: pure SCRAM versa SCRAM-as-GS2

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 05 February 2009 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089EA3A6ACC for <ietfarch-sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:22:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.526
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.526 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.073, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jVkaq9JVUfhp for <ietfarch-sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:22:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (properopus-pt.tunnel.tserv3.fmt2.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f04:392::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E0D3A6765 for <sasl-archive-Zoh8yoh9@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 13:22:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from balder-227.proper.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n15LFG61096693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:15:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.13.5/Submit) id n15LFGqs096692; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:15:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: balder-227.proper.com: majordom set sender to owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org using -f
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by balder-227.proper.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n15LF3iN096664 for <ietf-sasl@imc.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:15:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from alexey.melnikov@isode.com)
Received: from [92.40.224.11] (92.40.224.11.sub.mbb.three.co.uk [92.40.224.11]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <SYtW1AB0lEm-@rufus.isode.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2009 21:15:01 +0000
Message-ID: <498B569C.7070400@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:14:04 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: SASL WG <ietf-sasl@imc.org>
Subject: Poll: pure SCRAM versa SCRAM-as-GS2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf-sasl@mail.imc.org
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://www.imc.org/ietf-sasl/mail-archive/>
List-ID: <ietf-sasl.imc.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ietf-sasl-request@imc.org?body=unsubscribe>

Folks,
I would like to solicit feedback from people regarding the choice 
between 2 SCRAM versions:
 http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-newman-auth-scram-08.txt
and
 http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-newman-auth-scram-gs2-00.txt

You can use the following URL to see changes between them:
http://tools.ietf.org//rfcdiff?url1=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-newman-auth-scram-08.txt&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-newman-auth-scram-gs2-00.txt

Please send your opinion on which version you prefer (and a short 
explanation of why) to the mailing list, or say if you need more 
information.

I would like to get all answers before February 19th, please.

Regards,
Alexey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email