Re: [Schc] [lp-wan] Adoption call for draft-barthel-schc-oam-schc

[Sandra Cespedes <[e-mail]>]

Dear all,

I support the adoption of this draft. The functionality it provides is very useful.

Best,
Sandra.






From: Schc <[e-mail]> On Behalf Of Carles Gomez Montenegro
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2024 9:39 AM
To: Alexander PELOV <[e-mail]>
Cc: DIEGO DUJOVNE <[e-mail]>; schc <[e-mail]>; lp-wan <[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [Schc] [lp-wan] Adoption call for draft-barthel-schc-oam-schc


Attention This email originates from outside the concordia.ca domain. // Ce courriel provient de l'extérieur du domaine de concordia.ca


Dear all,

I support adopting the draft as well.

The draft provides very useful functionality, including that ICMPv6 header compression may be needed in environments beyond LPWAN (e.g., for Neighbor Discovery messages in draft-ietf-6lo-schc-15dot4-04 scenarios).

Cheers,

Carles





[https://s-install.avcdn.net/ipm/preview/icons/icon-envelope-tick-green-avg-v1.png]<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Libre de virus.www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>

On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 at 13:48, Alexander PELOV <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
(chair hat off)

Dear all,
+1 on my side as well.

Having ICMPv6 over SCHC, as well as other (potentially larger) parts of OAM are things we should be able to run over SCHC.

Cheers,
Alexander




----- Mail original -----
De: "DIEGO DUJOVNE" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
À: "Alexander PELOV" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: "schc" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "lp-wan" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Envoyé: Mardi 23 Janvier 2024 12:55:17
Objet: Re: [Schc] Adoption call for draft-barthel-schc-oam-schc

I agree to adopt this draft.
Regards,

        Diego Dujovne

El mar, 23 de ene de 2024, 07:36, Alexander PELOV <
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> escribió:

> Dear all,
>
> This is a call to adopt as a SCHC WG document. Please express support or
> opposition with a rationale either way.
>
> As a reminder, we've been working and discussing the document for quite
> some time now, and the call comes after IETF 118, where we discussed it and
> decided that it is time to start the call.
>
> The latest version can be found here :
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-barthel-schc-oam-schc/
>
>
> This call will end on Feb 6.
>
> Cheers
> The chairs
>
> --
> Schc mailing list
> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/schc
>

_______________________________________________
lp-wan mailing list
[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lp-wan