IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [scim] data format

Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com> Wed, 29 August 2012 14:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tonynad@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AB821F8505 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:45:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.253, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KMqu8f6wwZcS for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co1ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 408B221F84F9 for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:45:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail89-co1-R.bigfish.com (10.243.78.229) by CO1EHSOBE005.bigfish.com (10.243.66.68) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:16 +0000
Received: from mail89-co1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail89-co1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0ED768018B for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -34
X-BigFish: VS-34(zzbb2dI98dI154cP9371I542M1432Izz1202h1082kzz8275ch1033IL8275dhz2fh2a8h683h839h944hd25hf0ah107ah1220h1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail89-co1: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
Received: from mail89-co1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail89-co1 (MessageSwitch) id 1346251515265844_19011; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO1EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (unknown [10.243.78.234]) by mail89-co1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAA12C006E for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by CO1EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (10.243.66.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:14 +0000
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.114) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.80.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:05 +0000
Received: from mail65-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.249) by AM1EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.3.204.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:03 +0000
Received: from mail65-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail65-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A301C00D1 for <scim@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail65-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail65-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1346251501875078_15802; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.225]) by mail65-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3490100230; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0310HT005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by AM1EHSMHS001.bigfish.com (10.3.207.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:00 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.235]) by BL2PRD0310HT005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.97.40]) with mapi id 14.16.0190.008; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:00 +0000
From: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
To: Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Thread-Topic: [scim] data format
Thread-Index: AQHNhTB9l1Lv55pR3k62fypdT/wSB5dv9G8AgAAJLwCAAGI6AIAAKq8AgABUhhA=
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:44:59 +0000
Message-ID: <B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E75EA3B3BB@BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <503CE150.6030903@stpeter.im> <4BB9235E-F71A-4CFD-9D8F-28A1FB6AA6DF@unboundid.com> <503D6D90.5060402@stpeter.im> <503DBFF6.7090609@mnt.se> <CAF2hCbauTGs8LGDMBK3to1AT8QotJhHq6+7iUJJvRFLm965MCQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAF2hCbauTGs8LGDMBK3to1AT8QotJhHq6+7iUJJvRFLm965MCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [131.107.192.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BL2PRD0310HT005.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%ERDTMAN.SE$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%131.107.125.5$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%MNT.SE$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%131.107.125.5$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%131.107.125.5$TlsDn%
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [scim] data format
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:45:19 -0000

Not sure I quite understand the issue, I thought the issue would be more around the wire format and API then the attributes

-----Original Message-----
From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Samuel Erdtman
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 2:41 AM
To: Leif Johansson
Cc: scim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim] data format

Should we also look att aligning attributes to Windows Azure Active Directory Graph, or is that a completely different discussion?

regards
//Samuel


On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/29/2012 03:17 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 8/28/12 6:44 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>>> Peter,
>>
>>> Would this be in addition to or in lieu of the JSON and XML formats?
>>
>> Trey, that is a good question. There's an XML representation for
>> vCard4 (RFC 6351) and I've contributed to a document defining a JSON 
>> representation (draft-bhat-vcarddav-json), so we could potentially 
>> use those (which seems preferable to defining yet another one-off 
>> data model with both JSON and XML representations).
>> Ideally, I think we'd settle on just one mandatory-to-implement 
>> representation of whatever data model we choose.
>
> My recollection is that the wg in Vancouver expressed a pretty clear 
> consensus that it wanted to deprecate the XML representation in favor 
> of JSON. This will obviously need to be confirmed on the list but it 
> probably means that if vCard is to be considered that JSON version is 
> going to be important.
>
>         Cheers Leif
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlA9v/YACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfcTACfRDTzx7cS742H3wIrPeAXYzD0
> Gv8An2AIGV4JsB+gBRZgKxkIU6ZTrMLj
> =Niog
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email