IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [scim] data format

Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com> Wed, 29 August 2012 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <tonynad@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AAB11E80CC for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:43:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.729
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.729 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.262, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WM13+PzgS2QH for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:43:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from db3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (db3ehsobe002.messaging.microsoft.com [213.199.154.140]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D1811E80D5 for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail71-db3-R.bigfish.com (10.3.81.238) by DB3EHSOBE006.bigfish.com (10.3.84.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:43:28 +0000
Received: from mail71-db3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail71-db3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E254D4C01CF for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:43:28 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -34
X-BigFish: VS-34(zzbb2dI98dI154cP9371I542M1432Izz1202h1082kzz8275ch1033IL8275dhz2fh2a8h683h839h944hd25hf0ah107ah1220h1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail71-db3: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT004.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
Received: from mail71-db3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail71-db3 (MessageSwitch) id 1346251363526059_2270; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.81.240]) by mail71-db3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADD580047 for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by DB3EHSMHS016.bigfish.com (10.3.87.116) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:24 +0000
Received: from am1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.114) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.79.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:16 +0000
Received: from mail120-am1-R.bigfish.com (10.3.201.229) by AM1EHSOBE010.bigfish.com (10.3.204.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:11 +0000
Received: from mail120-am1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail120-am1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41A21E010F for <scim@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail120-am1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail120-am1 (MessageSwitch) id 1346251330257678_28490; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from AM1EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (unknown [10.3.201.244]) by mail120-am1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32CF41C0046; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0310HT004.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by AM1EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (10.3.207.158) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:10 +0000
Received: from BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.12.235]) by BL2PRD0310HT004.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.97.39]) with mapi id 14.16.0190.008; Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:09 +0000
From: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>, "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [scim] data format
Thread-Index: AQHNhTB9l1Lv55pR3k62fypdT/wSB5dv9G8AgAAJLwCAAGI6AIAAfpPA
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:42:09 +0000
Message-ID: <B26C1EF377CB694EAB6BDDC8E624B6E75EA3B390@BL2PRD0310MB362.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <503CE150.6030903@stpeter.im> <4BB9235E-F71A-4CFD-9D8F-28A1FB6AA6DF@unboundid.com> <503D6D90.5060402@stpeter.im> <503DBFF6.7090609@mnt.se>
In-Reply-To: <503DBFF6.7090609@mnt.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [131.107.192.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BL2PRD0310HT004.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%MNT.SE$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%131.107.125.5$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%131.107.125.5$TlsDn%
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14MLTC104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [scim] data format
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:43:42 -0000

I'm in favor of only a JSON representation

-----Original Message-----
From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leif Johansson
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2012 12:09 AM
To: scim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim] data format

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/29/2012 03:17 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 8/28/12 6:44 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>> Peter,
> 
>> Would this be in addition to or in lieu of the JSON and XML formats?
> 
> Trey, that is a good question. There's an XML representation for
> vCard4 (RFC 6351) and I've contributed to a document defining a JSON 
> representation (draft-bhat-vcarddav-json), so we could potentially use 
> those (which seems preferable to defining yet another one-off data 
> model with both JSON and XML representations).
> Ideally, I think we'd settle on just one mandatory-to-implement 
> representation of whatever data model we choose.

My recollection is that the wg in Vancouver expressed a pretty clear consensus that it wanted to deprecate the XML representation in favor of JSON. This will obviously need to be confirmed on the list but it probably means that if vCard is to be considered that JSON version is going to be important.

	Cheers Leif
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlA9v/YACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfcTACfRDTzx7cS742H3wIrPeAXYzD0
Gv8An2AIGV4JsB+gBRZgKxkIU6ZTrMLj
=Niog
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email