Re: [scim] data format

Should we also look att aligning attributes to Windows Azure Active
Directory Graph, or is that a completely different discussion?

regards
//Samuel

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 9:08 AM, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/29/2012 03:17 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
>> On 8/28/12 6:44 PM, Trey Drake wrote:
>>> Peter,
>>
>>> Would this be in addition to or in lieu of the JSON and XML
>>> formats?
>>
>> Trey, that is a good question. There's an XML representation for
>> vCard4 (RFC 6351) and I've contributed to a document defining a
>> JSON representation (draft-bhat-vcarddav-json), so we could
>> potentially use those (which seems preferable to defining yet
>> another one-off data model with both JSON and XML representations).
>> Ideally, I think we'd settle on just one mandatory-to-implement
>> representation of whatever data model we choose.
>
> My recollection is that the wg in Vancouver expressed a pretty clear
> consensus that it wanted to deprecate the XML representation in favor
> of JSON. This will obviously need to be confirmed on the list but it
> probably means that if vCard is to be considered that JSON version is
> going to be important.
>
>         Cheers Leif
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlA9v/YACgkQ8Jx8FtbMZnfcTACfRDTzx7cS742H3wIrPeAXYzD0
> Gv8An2AIGV4JsB+gBRZgKxkIU6ZTrMLj
> =Niog
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim