Re: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol
"Jari T. Malinen" <jmalinen@iprg.nokia.com> Sat, 22 December 2001 01:00 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA05839 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 20:00:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA21637; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:48:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA21604 for <seamoby@ns.ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:48:03 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (mailhost.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.5.12]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA05644 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 19:48:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (darkstar.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.5.69]) by mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3-GLGS) with ESMTP id QAA06461; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:47:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com (8.11.0/8.11.0-DARKSTAR) id fBM0l0i01916; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:47:00 -0800
X-mProtect: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:47:00 -0800 Nokia Silicon Valley Messaging Protection
Received: from jmalinen.iprg.nokia.com (205.226.2.98) by darkstar.iprg.nokia.com smtpd5VnzVO; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:46:59 PST
Received: from iprg.nokia.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jmalinen.iprg.nokia.com (8.9.3/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA54468; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:46:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3C23D802.5E052D52@iprg.nokia.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:46:58 -0800
From: "Jari T. Malinen" <jmalinen@iprg.nokia.com>
Organization: Nokia
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba@tari.toshiba.com>
CC: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>, seamoby@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol
References: <20011221000542.GE1492@catfish> <021401c18a56$97540110$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF> <20011221203645.GD709@catfish> <033301c18a73$44673090$7e6015ac@T23KEMPF> <20011221230244.GA1194@catfish>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hello, Having a design team framework document is ok, currently the draft-renker gives a multitude of choices to do a protocol. Ultimately we'll need something simple and unambiguous. This would need strong modification to become a real protocol from its current format which looks more like an architecture with candidate modes for several functionalities. I second that the requirement for protocol independence is important. Hence, I suggest structuring the document in a way that decouples the protocol from all other protocols (MIPv6 etc. included) so much that they do not need ideally to be even refered to at all. If needed, there should be appendices describing interaction but only in the case it is essential for the working of the protocol in some mode etc. Interdependences should be minimized. Merry Christmas and a Happy New year all, -Jari On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 06:45:59PM +0100, Marco Liebsch wrote: > Dear all, > I will try to structure a draft framework, which is then for discussion > on the list, taking first the protocol as it is now and moving the > Mobile IPv6 options to be considered for MIP optimization purposes into > the Annex (open). We have to think about extensions and address the > parts the assessment draft refers to. Until first framework is > available, please be referred to the current version of the base-line > concept draft-renker-paging-ipv6-01.txt and also think of issues to be > clarifed with respect to what is already written. So we can address > these issues and have enhancements in the first draft version, which > could be submitted end of January, if the WG agrees and we proceed. What > do you think? > > I wish you all a merry Christmas and a happy new year. I will be back in > the office around Jan, 10th. > > Marco > _______________________________________________ Seamoby mailing list Seamoby@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby
- [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol assessm… Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol ass… James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol ass… Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol ass… James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol ass… Jari T. Malinen
- Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol ass… Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol Jari T. Malinen
- Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol ass… James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol ass… James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol ass… Yoshihiro Ohba
- Re: [Seamoby] comments on the paging protocol ass… James Kempf
- Re: [Seamoby] framework for DMHA protocol ralf.schmitz