IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder

"James Kempf" <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com> Tue, 04 May 2004 17:11 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA13359 for <seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 13:11:06 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL3LI-0005UW-Cl for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 13:04:28 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i44H4SC2021104 for seamoby-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 4 May 2004 13:04:28 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL3C7-0002vw-UK for seamoby-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 12:54:59 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA12427 for <seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 12:54:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BL3C6-0002bY-8K for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 12:54:58 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BL3BB-0002UT-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 12:54:02 -0400
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BL3Ab-0002NZ-00 for seamoby-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 12:53:25 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL30W-00088a-R8; Tue, 04 May 2004 12:43:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1BL2wO-0006tK-4D for seamoby@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 12:38:44 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA11819 for <seamoby@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 May 2004 12:38:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([132.151.6.1] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BL2wM-0001Dw-Fr for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 12:38:42 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BL2vM-00019V-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 12:37:40 -0400
Received: from key1.docomolabs-usa.com ([216.98.102.225] helo=fridge.docomolabs-usa.com ident=fwuser) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BL2uo-00015k-00 for seamoby@ietf.org; Tue, 04 May 2004 12:37:06 -0400
Message-ID: <005801c431f6$2064a880$366115ac@dcml.docomolabsusa.com>
From: James Kempf <kempf@docomolabs-usa.com>
To: john.loughney@nokia.com, seamoby@ietf.org
References: <DADF50F5EC506B41A0F375ABEB320636D44D2B@esebe023.ntc.nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [Seamoby] Review Period Reminder
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 09:37:43 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: seamoby-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: seamoby@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Context Transfer, Handoff Candidate Discovery, and Dormant Mode Host Alerting <seamoby.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:seamoby@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby>, <mailto:seamoby-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi John,

Previous comments in another email, continuing...

>6) Section 6.0 - is MLD the only current context profile type?  Shouldn't
 >  we also allocate one for header compression as that is being specified?

I'm a little reluctant to step into that political minefield, especially
since there is not yet an RFC track draft with a header compression context
defined in it. I've seen an individual draft, but I don't know whether the
authors are intending to submit it for publication, and there is as yet no
WG draft in the ROHC group. I'll ask Allison.

>7) Section 7.0 says:
>
>     The Seamoby Working Group requests that IANA maintain allocations for
the
>     port number and ICMP message type number for a minimum of 3 years
after
>     which the allocations SHOULD be released, unless the Seamoby protocols
are
>     advanced in some form to Proposed Standard.
>
>   Three years from what date? Publication of this draft, from publication
as RFC?

Good point. I think 3 years from publication of the draft.

            jak



_______________________________________________
Seamoby mailing list
Seamoby@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/seamoby

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email