Re: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13

Hi again, let me correct the following part of my previous email.

> [New]
> "SHOULD avoid using multiple ports"  corresponds to Section 5.1.1
>
> and
>
> "SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds
to Section 5.1.2

[New]
"SHOULD avoid using multiple ports"  corresponds to Section 5.1.1

and

"SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds to
Section 5.1

Thank you.
Take

> -----Original Message-----
> From: secdir [mailto:secdir-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Takeshi
> Takahashi
> Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2016 7:06 PM
> To: lars@netapp.com; iesg@ietf.org; secdir@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis.all@ietf.org
> Subject: [secdir] Secdir review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis-13
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
> These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area
> directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any
> other last call comments.
> 
> [General summary]
> 
> This document is ready.
> 
> [Topic of this draft]
> 
> This draft talks about the UDP Usage Guidelines and replaces RFC 5405
(BCP).
> It talks about how to use UDP, especially it pays attention to the fair
> use
> of the network resourced and talks a lot on congestion control.
> 
> The RFC 5045 focuses on unicast case, but this bis document talks about
> multicast, (anycast, broadcast, )and IP tunneling cases.
> 
> The content is useful, and I hope to see this draft to be published as an
> RFC.
> 
> [Clarification question]
> 
> In Table 1 "Summary of recommendations", I wonder if the corresponding
> section numbers are correct.
> 
> [Now]
> "SHOULD avoid using multiple ports"  corresponds to Section 5.1
> and
> "SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds
> to
> Section 5.2
> 
> [New]
> "SHOULD avoid using multiple ports"  corresponds to Section 5.1.1
> and
> "SHOULD use a randomized source port or equivalent technique" corresponds
> to
> Section 5.1.2
> 
> I might be wrong, so please check.
> 
> Also I have seen several typos (especially, missing parentheses around
> referenced section numbers) on this document, so please revise the texts
> before the publication of this document.
> 
> Thank you.
> Take
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview