IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases-05

Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 24 February 2024 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A282C14F5E8; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:11:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a9Rs0ZtIjfzj; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:11:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2933C14E515; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:11:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d22b8801b9so32364801fa.0; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:11:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1708809110; x=1709413910; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=U6VE540poY01QAXrc+sxJWDCGy8uVGpH9Tq6h8gB+sc=; b=L6cEooBPGrr577h1EdqdKBgFPd/Aj0M5EkwgaIpFiCpLFB1alJZsiG0m64IhnUtpnt c2QZuaxz71I+RQWuOUL9xxdtIzNKTonPhdT5y5zr1mQ+rhohu740PKGH+DKjelLsDy+T BWOtmdcMjS5gSOuh30wDS0KwtRW7gTqF0Vk0thmDemxr+tO6lNiTlHKaRmRAsv1BnqoY zQ17oOs5H/7Z3q3BybIJAiz9/D5JboYBX996yWqLw06r7eFAkTJu9kbvV0vTyEa6i+Yi Z2/WbZk1lAb77AUE/1SeMyR8l6LZF6eqvlve3CieR36hEVjcq02Y2KFszNPk1qyATz15 0JhA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1708809110; x=1709413910; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=U6VE540poY01QAXrc+sxJWDCGy8uVGpH9Tq6h8gB+sc=; b=Y4pUP2a47Jcap6sdUbuQdPwX/f39MIbMcsxi5AnAhZbyqm4zLYT/lcbK2iapIQRaU8 V7Sce3HZ0Z7a2RAXde+JJIKZ+b+IyIVhiBYI7R1iYZTW+1Vpo98uvP6j5jVtpEy/OGPK 3LLxT3C4y/13MCwkMvRiNhefkQtH7dKc1QaEA2BR0Qx0PX+AyWXc6PaaQW72or+dylve cmtDTlifTuoxM6TGSExNygw3Wt6d58lGaNLBFGOm7gbOzWHpAIWoI0LMLX+0HoCfJSq1 0O2+dbqtwC3fKRPnsFQ4CR0cDdaAXhgqcjc5QoN6un+ZzHm2ZSzO36i2fDfNaoND5Yva eYEQ==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUEHx+bT8Jn7qoUpN8qdNNOQagSM2eLac9KPd9+NOkBPI6PDRvyzYBpZTbNZSex4CCUFtSavvlcIDcav8NHkUZNMxKWcBz7GomDG273iF35+H/jk2V2O8sqCXE8O0BQN8JKQES2zU3IqR5JxEuMs4DbbpYQy8X0vg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwS+JKljeltviz3feylsk0+ewVIVkDLwZctg7zczkQVsKu7x6jj +ShnQtqO3i6BrVAPWJquluqym2JjmAL2ZZdp8yE6hm0vyZ70qsJwUXM/d+dJ40OoYcVYREVGgWY rBUpBdUrElESi1zK0sqinpehKisydqHg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGT2ZRcnWlg+wwwlaBoOfAd/0XaUz9puWClswjh/ZOToG3EkNYPDgD4AeJ5OFUHg59pbq8pQ+BjyPPyeP/qd8=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:92c9:0:b0:2d2:73d1:d259 with SMTP id k9-20020a2e92c9000000b002d273d1d259mr1417097ljh.23.1708809109893; Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:11:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <170874131866.41983.13688683489140156145@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <170874131866.41983.13688683489140156145@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 13:11:38 -0800
Message-ID: <CABY-gOO+hh47PTKQzCapNO6V4sh7ngok5MgMmuO588J9LpEYmQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
Cc: secdir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org, tvr@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000fbf6340612271fae"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/TD1_JLYlJxxvJsK0os70F8dcP08>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases-05
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 21:11:53 -0000

Hi Sean,

Thanks for the review.

Regarding your second comment, yes, mobile satellites movements are
pre-determined, and it's a TVR use case.

Thanks,
Yingzhen

On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 6:21 PM Sean Turner via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Sean Turner
> Review result: Ready
>
> Hi! This is my second review of this I-D; I compared -04 to -05.  I had two
> points:
>
> 1. Thanks for a greatly improved security considerations section. While it
> is
> still essentially empty, now readers will know why! ;)
>
> Changing my review to "Ready" based on the changes to the security
> considerations.
>
> 2. I am going to infer from the changes made in s5.3 (dropping the intro
> sentence and adding the sentence about the ground station) means that
> mobile
> satellites are not a non-deterministic scenario. But, it would be nice to
> confirm this.


>
Cheers,
> spt
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email