IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09

Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com> Wed, 25 December 2019 04:34 UTC

Return-Path: <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDD7120125; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 20:34:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VU2ylmbU-CAf; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 20:34:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22f.google.com (mail-lj1-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F227120071; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 20:34:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id y6so14118493lji.0; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 20:34:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NOg1hF3tnOUIuEohl2L03ZSDXE5LJF7ZP5SWDQ21eCY=; b=mpN7+x+ShVdYxyQquk2ww7WO5KoXiSI6hKwUN455vlZIRlwpo4NWdVac3k40UDfSug /8e9H+BkHu3X5Lf0CpK0NkirFwfoLZo9iJyYLgBASJ7zR+icHoBEY8gMh220hbr0yZsh SzI8c7Cj6w2uL1GT9Fz7JZKCJccDRv2o9kuITLzdT7zEfqkQrGfVXaeu6D2ZJ9MW1Amz PlcaFp4k3RlhO5xCLqSwvLVDP/+b2yjKazvl1K93AVS5mAkIQkTCtgfehwo52tsvCvEc WJBJQ2L4SvCJtZFESkMiFY3IwlKE4egq4Di4xsqkd1M0wRlLeOWwSPsHTa3T60uLMOhB 24fw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NOg1hF3tnOUIuEohl2L03ZSDXE5LJF7ZP5SWDQ21eCY=; b=DT9nr80rSu2ajYGfESgiv/v4xk7vNnfu6lntd8596vMcV6ofvCuv5MROkjPVZcZY0x 6DYbKNtS1s9hhDga4l7GzB3FFGB6ep2AQLzLmj/BNR91FQeimdmnjMB/mC8GCmwcD5zf WpFGooL+YdR8pQ5KJVmPDSR+V4bzdmbGB91OsJbjK2P9qvOmBLT4rczLjQLT7Vh0o9va n8mMy3uMEqEpV4iBaWOiJ95JMeeshX7t1yYjBmAXDIhK7P+eO57khTD3fUCZuts7fx1K Al0Y0POkxcVCQIWevVVKyl27iaZFkEnpdQoafB5+jMYhj7bQrkcgGzRQU2ndhR/PrNUY eNZA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXnLGaUHtZ2EiyFTTdkmKUWvg9qkcL479eOI0qIIwHMRh0GmTri GXQEwWlPPz40r3JTWCpehVHr06fbIhD5wHn5VHw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8rSq5gJ27w+iMRxhGfyMWJRIStD6OWFpFyCJsmNqPeHbaZnTjD6RvVKl7+nD8S83FNzY7IQ2bPKKMPKu0vGM=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8551:: with SMTP id u17mr16949442ljj.165.1577248449086; Tue, 24 Dec 2019 20:34:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <157724651034.19353.11323639071881214460@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <157724651034.19353.11323639071881214460@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2019 20:33:57 -0800
Message-ID: <CACsn0ckGSZUjKBfv29CmA+QSu-xPc6OHe6AvB854s-bUtbbjjA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Watson Ladd <watsonbladd@gmail.com>
Cc: secdir <secdir@ietf.org>, "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>, last-call@ietf.org, draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2.all@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000087cc6f059a7fc5b3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_nM3S5bhk-6bDqfHVKRQW0n5XXA>
Subject: Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 04:34:14 -0000

Damn misclick. I meant With Nits.

On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 8:02 PM Watson Ladd via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Reviewer: Watson Ladd
> Review result: Not Ready
>
> Twas the night before Christmas
> when all through the house
> someone was desperately trying to get a review done on time.
>
> I didn't see anything wrong per se in the draft itself, but I found the
> capitalization of quantum computer an odd choice. IKEv2 is a complicated
> protocol, and I am not 100% sure that this draft does what we want it to:
> It
> would be great if someone could check very carefully in some symbolic
> model,
> ala what has been done in TLS. The guidance on sizes seems to rule out NIST
> level 1, but not any higher levels: might be worth calling out this
> explicitly.
>
> _______________________________________________
> secdir mailing list
> secdir@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir
> wiki: http://tools.ietf.org/area/sec/trac/wiki/SecDirReview
>


-- 
"Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
--Rousseau.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email