Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Thu, 26 December 2019 17:58 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ECC5120875; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 09:58:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wvZmMefd9vAC; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 09:58:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [193.110.157.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE890120874; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 09:58:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47kHjx5bJLzDJZ; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:57:57 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1577383077; bh=OxVekRl0JUVL+q4ZngfPRFsvm9HIBcbt7IkuCIKpels=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=taUljMVQbIH/7AD1aNNlfD1v9v+9NzaF6x05ABQKT85c1bXy747f3RYMCDOdgV8h9 PEp5xZQH3DXNE16JpuHiCh1fhInIWGLJgwINuS38YTV659slPzYCSpWBShNWWRKU1l MLHkJrM8INgj9OV+jt0aK+VTC1GdFzN6JK9bmmqA=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ve1096K8jqt; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:57:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [76.10.157.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 18:57:56 +0100 (CET)
Received: by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 97B576007AD8; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 12:57:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93B0D65E47; Thu, 26 Dec 2019 12:57:55 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 12:57:55 -0500
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Valery Smyslov <svan@elvis.ru>
cc: "ipsec@ietf.org WG" <ipsec@ietf.org>, 'secdir' <secdir@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <008601d5bb53$75269480$5f73bd80$@elvis.ru>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1912261257070.11522@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <003901d5bb48$cfc21460$6f463d20$@smyslov.net> <8A4F97F4-723E-41C8-B4F6-C6D65F0BC848@mit.edu> <008601d5bb53$75269480$5f73bd80$@elvis.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/kpfrINkU1jRhzhFOEnvguHT4zFY>
Subject: Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-qr-ikev2-09
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 17:58:06 -0000
On Wed, 25 Dec 2019, Valery Smyslov wrote: > Uri, I don't mind referencing NIST levels, but I'd like to first hear from my co-authors, > > who are definitely more experienced in cryptography and in NIST levels than I am :-) I don't think mentioning the NIST competition is useful. Per definition, that is incomplete preliminary data. Paul
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ip… Watson Ladd via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Watson Ladd
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Uri Blumenthal
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Watson Ladd
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Watson Ladd
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Uri Blumenthal
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Valery Smyslov
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Paul Wouters
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … R. Atkinson
- Re: [secdir] [IPsec] [Last-Call] Secdir last call… Panos Kampanakis (pkampana)