IETF Logo Mail Archive

[secdir] Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-12

Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com> Wed, 26 June 2013 08:11 UTC

Return-Path: <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8F121E80CD; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:11:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g7e1X-G2zo6h; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:11:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1106E21E8064; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r5Q8BIu2020084 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:11:19 GMT
Received: from aserz7021.oracle.com (aserz7021.oracle.com [141.146.126.230]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5Q8BGPx017691 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:11:17 GMT
Received: from abhmt113.oracle.com (abhmt113.oracle.com [141.146.116.65]) by aserz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5Q8BGtg001187; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:11:16 GMT
Received: from [10.159.121.201] (/10.159.121.201) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 01:11:16 -0700
Message-ID: <51CAA254.6040303@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 02:12:04 -0600
From: Shawn M Emery <shawn.emery@oracle.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: secdir@ietf.org
References: <519097A8.40409@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <519097A8.40409@oracle.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <519097A8.40409@oracle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]
Cc: draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb.all@tools.ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [secdir] Review of draft-ietf-xrblock-rtcp-xr-jb-12
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/secdir>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:11:37 -0000

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security
area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these
comments just like any other last call comments.

This internet-draft specifies a RTP Control Protocol (RTCP) Extended Report
(XR) Block for data on jitter buffer configuration and performance.

The security considerations section does exist and states that the new block
data does not introduce any additional security concerns than those stated
in the base XR spec, RFC 3611.  I believe this to be an accurate assertion.

General comments:

I found the draft slightly hard to read, as the terminology and abbreviations
used are not expanded.  For example, the abstract has "RTP", but never expands
the abbreviation.

Editorial comments:

s/[RFC6390]and/[RFC6390] and/

Shawn.
--

v2.14.0 | Report a Bug | By Email