[secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04
Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 10 February 2021 12:44 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: secdir@ietf.org
Delivered-To: secdir@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0593A0EC6; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:44:47 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Valery Smyslov via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: secdir@ietf.org
Cc: calsify@ietf.org, draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.25.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161296108746.13523.4234835837695144328@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Valery Smyslov <valery@smyslov.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 04:44:47 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/jWTUEi-j-Tpmh8utWxXHqMvXKtw>
Subject: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-calext-valarm-extensions-04
X-BeenThere: secdir@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Security Area Directorate <secdir.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/secdir/>
List-Post: <mailto:secdir@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/secdir>, <mailto:secdir-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 12:44:48 -0000
Reviewer: Valery Smyslov Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The draft defines a set of extensions to the VALARM component of iCalendar. The document is short and well written, its Security Considerations and Privacy Considerations sections are sensible. I found the document ready. Nit: I would recommend adding a sentence to the Security Considerations section saying that these VALARM extensions inherited security properties of iCalendar [RFC5545].
- [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-ca… Valery Smyslov via Datatracker
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Ken Murchison
- Re: [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-iet… Ken Murchison
- Re: [secdir] [Last-Call] Secdir last call review … Valery Smyslov