Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
"Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <venggovi@cisco.com> Tue, 09 July 2019 12:16 UTC
Return-Path: <venggovi@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3536D12013F for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:16:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=OUNJWCz0; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=UV1na4Uh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vRxIyIZPyVOs for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56D0D12013C for <sfc@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 05:16:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8825; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1562674614; x=1563884214; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=xXLkvwU6fzkBHc8a6rcNsivyy80s/In/BluP9xvGG2Y=; b=OUNJWCz0IH2mYGDNYoytd4/IV2HFO3TzakMOye0ZPjfh73RHNXlPrekv dwWeiiPFGI5qF9JeIxwgAXgDsMR41UEPy4qm5Sb7MiyshZl0I978VGtQF ps0sTQkl0HgvV2LBAyQQTg4qmocM9+W899XxxEWVkEfTD2Pd7YfJ6ddHX o=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:Kb8ONhX5YjaOj50Uibk9eE65Ls7V8LGuZFwc94YnhrRSc6+q45XlOgnF6O5wiEPSA9yJ8OpK3uzRta2oGXcN55qMqjgjSNRNTFdE7KdehAk8GIiAAEz/IuTtankkEcJNW1h7/lmwMFNeH4D1YFiB6nA=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0APAAAmhSRd/5xdJa1mGwEBAQEDAQEBBwMBAQGBUwYBAQELAYEUL1ADalUgBAsoh2MDhFKJeIJbknKEVIEuFIEQA1QJAQEBDAEBIgsCAQGBBV2CXgKCQyM0CQ4BAwEBBAEBAgEFbYU8DIVKAQEBAQMSGxMBASwMDwIBCBEEAQEoBzIUCQgCBAESCBqCewQCgR1NAx0BDp9EAoE4iGCCI4J5AQEFgUZBgnsDFYISAwaBNAGLXheBQD+BEEeCTD6CYQICAQEWgQ8FAQwGASEkBwmDBoImjCyHQYhnjgIJAoIXhlaNSoIshyGOM40wh0GPfQIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUDgNWnFwFTuCbBOCCiSDcYUUhT9yAQEBAYEljAoOF4E9bwEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,470,1557187200"; d="scan'208,217";a="579842992"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Jul 2019 12:16:52 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (xch-rcd-001.cisco.com [173.37.102.11]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x69CGqD7003840 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:16:52 GMT
Received: from xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) by XCH-RCD-001.cisco.com (173.37.102.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 07:16:51 -0500
Received: from xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) by xhs-aln-002.cisco.com (173.37.135.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 07:16:50 -0500
Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (64.101.32.56) by xhs-rtp-003.cisco.com (64.101.210.230) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 08:16:50 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=QSt1+A3X6F/lZYS2JyrGAAGSr/hSsxdMoIxpBkAub94=; b=UV1na4UhJewYz5m/XAGIqeG/o1oRltJPzGhyk1m3QJh+/EHmGPPjgLvv5o0CG6fA0IpX+QBwZiLtAHwcEwL9frX7YVv6vN8rHH/FKASyvI/6zaeiuPjmguIN3j2QggETZ6joRn6TRC/WfGkyliVZV/THvwmtnzzwhlb877TgYr8=
Received: from CY4PR11MB1767.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.175.61.148) by CY4PR11MB1959.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.175.63.7) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2052.15; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:43:57 +0000
Received: from CY4PR11MB1767.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3daa:5722:d0d9:aab8]) by CY4PR11MB1767.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::3daa:5722:d0d9:aab8%9]) with mapi id 15.20.2052.019; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 11:43:57 +0000
From: "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <venggovi@cisco.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
Thread-Index: AQHVFWHG6SZyvEyD3EGGLNC6v36bBKbA8JWQgAF6p5A=
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 11:43:57 +0000
Message-ID: <CY4PR11MB17671EABB0DB92F312C4B24ACDF10@CY4PR11MB1767.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BYAPR13MB25978FD458B59EB22067685FD21E0@BYAPR13MB2597.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CH2PR13MB36080759DE5185750C651A2AD2F60@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR13MB36080759DE5185750C651A2AD2F60@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=venggovi@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [2001:420:5244:1300:c43:3859:506e:760]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 916a6cf0-7b6d-43e9-0c89-08d70462ba68
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:CY4PR11MB1959;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: CY4PR11MB1959:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 3
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <CY4PR11MB19599C5A65C1FCC047DC70D1CDF10@CY4PR11MB1959.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7691;
x-forefront-prvs: 0093C80C01
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(39860400002)(136003)(366004)(396003)(376002)(199004)(189003)(76176011)(9686003)(446003)(6306002)(54896002)(7736002)(53936002)(2906002)(71190400001)(11346002)(68736007)(236005)(52536014)(486006)(25786009)(110136005)(478600001)(7696005)(71200400001)(606006)(6436002)(102836004)(316002)(6506007)(33656002)(74316002)(53546011)(186003)(476003)(55016002)(66476007)(66556008)(966005)(46003)(64756008)(66446008)(73956011)(76116006)(14454004)(86362001)(66946007)(8676002)(790700001)(6116002)(81156014)(81166006)(2501003)(5660300002)(256004)(229853002)(14444005)(99286004)(6246003)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:CY4PR11MB1959; H:CY4PR11MB1767.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: io5G2NA97w8AWekegcajEgDuYroACIcJRqJHrKMcDzMgkAbq4vwb8gfoHPao9Lu4YFnL0dy07QWZRWpsXIN+//KyvvCIwBtC2rB1G7XZRs/nqrc+AMpsz7S7Ujgjf3mBlctOaOMq+sYoDdowX6egxdduGeNZWvRn9ORaI1MpbpzaHhUqampOO/5PBSBhgTj9PdZ5VeKDS4/Ej6IbwLHtb6+UFmRFirodOz4yO0YAW3lSNpIshK0kQvuT1C9FFe+25DqpMHdLY8g/gbMtIsOthYHoiFf9+wDqeqMNr/qF4M16ZXs03dP7owkUvuiing9YVMQBKInHQCcFDlEPLYcsEFrEytz22sQ2RYh0Uu7EHNjMFEfV+41F3fKkNHOuDsSp+cS+lvhRROCzjL/QlWZwwI5KN9xt/73Y3VFRFTOQkX8=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CY4PR11MB17671EABB0DB92F312C4B24ACDF10CY4PR11MB1767namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 916a6cf0-7b6d-43e9-0c89-08d70462ba68
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jul 2019 11:43:57.4840 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: venggovi@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY4PR11MB1959
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.102.11, xch-rcd-001.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-5.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/8ejD26XApfSxqi1lUp6d0gYr0ZI>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:16:57 -0000
Support, A useful document that outlines the layering and the options available for OAM functions for SFC. A nit - the second paragraph talks about initiators that are relevant to S-BFD only but it begins with "BFD or S-BFD ...". This could be made briefer to limit it to S-BFD only. Thanks, Prasad From: sfc <sfc-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of James Guichard Sent: Monday, July 8, 2019 18:45 To: sfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06 Dear WG: Before closing this WG Last Call, we (the chairs) would like to better understand the level of interest and commitment the WG has on progressing OAM work for SFC, starting with draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework as a baseline. Please reply to this email with either support for the document, or non-support (we do not need this document). Silence does not imply support or lack thereof so please take time to state your opinions with a brief rational for support/non-support. Thanks! Jim & Joel From: James Guichard Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 10:30 AM To: sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org> Subject: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06 Dear WG: This message starts a new two week WG Last Call on advancing https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework/<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Ce47e5eb13f224f18c46408d6e378b2f7%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636946504868870205&sdata=lkKvAgmKik7lkqGANQpnIvBRdbjKAqYtzTUdTfB9f3Y%3D&reserved=0> for publication as an Informational RFC. Substantive comments and statements of support for publishing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors. This last call will end on 11th June 2019. Thanks! Jim & Joel
- [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06 James Guichard
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Andrew G. Malis
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… James Guichard
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Sami Boutros
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Anoop Ghanwani
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Sam Aldrin
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Ashish Panda (aspanda)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… James Guichard
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Nagendra Kumar Nainar (naikumar)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… James Guichard
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… James Guichard
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Greg Mirsky
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… James Guichard
- Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framewo… Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)