IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Tue, 09 July 2019 00:49 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8662F1202AE for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:49:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b=JO4I77vI; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com header.b=bsW+xUXh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4e-oYQvZFIux for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.86.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDFD612032B for <sfc@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 17:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18721; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1562633393; x=1563842993; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=S6wvdebCHFY6AOOAVoe1JvVKyZczTIXN1nvBOV8j0rk=; b=JO4I77vIkCYg1cSADZ6Jv+TW6rIoO7OPCqAKwSt1ey1Fl/NyAvBLr27r 5/XOzAMCgGhPnuJY8x+K0uIoEyJMdW1Xh1XQr4iay/f3ERUhbvgOEirsU IdpyBZyyfG92Tiss9usiLjrYwlT7fJnbXh2dgkLkGxli5tTufDeI3gONh A=;
IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:TiSFVxadt01pFa5303yXAu//LSx94ef9IxIV55w7irlHbqWk+dH4MVfC4el20gabRp3VvvRDjeee87vtX2AN+96giDgDa9QNMn1NksAKh0olCc+BB1f8Kavhdy01Gs1eXXdu/mqwNg5eH8OtL1A=
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AJAADA4yNd/5pdJa1lGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBVAQBAQEBCwGBFC9QA2pVIAQLKAqEEoNHA45JgluScoRUgS4UgRADVAkBAQEMAQEYAQkLAgEBgQVdgl4CF4IhIzUIDgEDAQEEAQECAQVtijcMhUoBAQEEAQEQER0BASwLAQ8CAQgRBAEBKAMCAgIlCxQJCAIEDgUignsEAQGBHU0DHQECDJ52AoE4iGBxgTKCeQEBBYFGQUCCOQMVghIDBoE0AYteF4FAP4E4H4JMPoJhAQECAQEWgQ8FARIBHhgWCYJUMoImjCyCRIR9iGeOAgkCgheGVo0uG4IshyGOMZRwjHODCgIEAgQFAg4BAQWBUQE2DVpxcBU7KgGCQRMrgV8kg3GFFIU/cgEBAQGBJYtGgSIBMW8BAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,468,1557187200"; d="scan'208,217";a="594819298"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 09 Jul 2019 00:49:51 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (xch-aln-002.cisco.com [173.36.7.12]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x690np6Y003829 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:49:51 GMT
Received: from xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 19:49:51 -0500
Received: from xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) by xhs-rcd-002.cisco.com (173.37.227.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 19:49:50 -0500
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (72.163.14.9) by xhs-rcd-001.cisco.com (173.37.227.246) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 8 Jul 2019 19:49:50 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-cisco-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=S6wvdebCHFY6AOOAVoe1JvVKyZczTIXN1nvBOV8j0rk=; b=bsW+xUXhUvz6iljFlzi4TQGqgq+aKl3SVBxRVw7KdAZyVGdxY3MwdGQzXwx6wAUNc+OdqQ1pPPeGEJgysoqNglR/2wfIkymbP7UxnJqnm9BzQNMAeZrj+EPeRPCVD97k6SyhZtEhJsb2+rVLdRDHxjJGj/FbJb3kIjEi1P9+HqU=
Received: from BL0PR11MB3028.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (20.177.204.138) by BL0PR11MB3457.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (10.167.240.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2052.18; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:35:07 +0000
Received: from BL0PR11MB3028.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::28e3:f8a3:596:b998]) by BL0PR11MB3028.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::28e3:f8a3:596:b998%3]) with mapi id 15.20.2052.020; Tue, 9 Jul 2019 00:35:07 +0000
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>
CC: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
Thread-Index: AQHVFWHG6SZyvEyD3EGGLNC6v36bBKbA8JWQgADA94A=
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:35:07 +0000
Message-ID: <A29681E9-CFC8-445F-B560-7426B0E7F787@cisco.com>
References: <BYAPR13MB25978FD458B59EB22067685FD21E0@BYAPR13MB2597.namprd13.prod.outlook.com> <CH2PR13MB36080759DE5185750C651A2AD2F60@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CH2PR13MB36080759DE5185750C651A2AD2F60@CH2PR13MB3608.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=cpignata@cisco.com;
x-originating-ip: [173.38.117.89]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 033dca1a-efc3-4db4-83b6-08d704054b19
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(8989299)(4534185)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990200)(5600148)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:BL0PR11MB3457;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL0PR11MB3457:
x-ms-exchange-purlcount: 2
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BL0PR11MB3457DA190D2CB18036816E89C7F10@BL0PR11MB3457.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:9508;
x-forefront-prvs: 0093C80C01
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(396003)(346002)(136003)(366004)(376002)(39860400002)(199004)(189003)(6916009)(71200400001)(76176011)(6512007)(66066001)(4326008)(71190400001)(486006)(25786009)(53546011)(6506007)(86362001)(6486002)(5660300002)(50226002)(102836004)(36756003)(236005)(6116002)(2616005)(3846002)(6246003)(11346002)(476003)(446003)(14454004)(186003)(26005)(2906002)(6436002)(73956011)(66946007)(54896002)(66556008)(66476007)(64756008)(66446008)(76116006)(6306002)(57306001)(14444005)(99286004)(33656002)(256004)(966005)(68736007)(606006)(316002)(478600001)(7736002)(53936002)(81156014)(8676002)(81166006)(8936002)(229853002)(91024005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BL0PR11MB3457; H:BL0PR11MB3028.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: cisco.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Lf605qj6Sm6XAcX7ibDdmxTD5566k5lWTE2BgLUa3Mx8014/Ed6ICP8iuMi+0sWceEuRdLz+4CtknfLRQ9GJ+0AE1B1OIU/JG+k1cVQbGTgicrE6TurJ+NLTdltBHo7j/KL9ff8odzGJcp9e05P3/OkZ9BaT0zdw3ij1wG4SigHEHkMWBqFrU8yHghKJWJhs4XCv1wp/K3wqb3kHQlx5g3aEcbCEt0pryns0y4AT02wzIyZFJ/2UJ0RQGTZ1/hOc2TE+LMqmFANg7QtyeefZT3VY58ibfiGHudgekmSckysmYKs7LMfvJJGV+sBHSk6w49b4yjyVvTD1IEZ7y7wXgAZR2pZSHs7ZWvs+3/IYr2K5UwAA+uKhB1GGo442kz1MUYGT69VbXLjC5N+Lu6I55dDdOC5oXi1QJr48MxzZ5dY=
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A29681E9CFC8445FB5607426B0E7F787ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 033dca1a-efc3-4db4-83b6-08d704054b19
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Jul 2019 00:35:07.7005 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: cpignata@cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR11MB3457
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.36.7.12, xch-aln-002.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: rcdn-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Ehgn94DBGaxxRp2VTbtxkZ3_JFE>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 00:49:58 -0000

Jim & Joel,

I share Med’s opinion that progressing OAM for SFC is one of the key missing pieces in this WG.

The framework document structures and “frames” the topic in a useful level way.

Looking at the SFC Charter, i.e., the contract between the WG and IETF [RFC 2418], this would be Deliverable #5.

    5. OAM Framework document to provide a common basis for OAM work.

And the following (second-to-last) overdue milestone:

Oct 2018        Informational document defining the Operation, Administration and Maintenance (OAM) framework for SFC
Oh, “support” :-)

Thanks,

Carlos.

On Jul 8, 2019, at 9:15 AM, James Guichard <james.n.guichard@futurewei.com<mailto:james.n.guichard@futurewei.com>> wrote:

Dear WG:

Before closing this WG Last Call, we (the chairs) would like to better understand the level of interest and commitment the WG has on progressing OAM work for SFC, starting with draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework as a baseline. Please reply to this email with either support for the document, or non-support (we do not need this document). Silence does not imply support or lack thereof so please take time to state your opinions with a brief rational for support/non-support.

Thanks!

Jim & Joel


From: James Guichard
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2019 10:30 AM
To: sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
Subject: WG Last Call draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework-06


Dear WG:



This message starts a new two week WG Last Call on advancing https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework/<https://nam03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-sfc-oam-framework%2F&data=02%7C01%7Cjames.n.guichard%40futurewei.com%7Ce47e5eb13f224f18c46408d6e378b2f7%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C0%7C636946504868870205&sdata=lkKvAgmKik7lkqGANQpnIvBRdbjKAqYtzTUdTfB9f3Y%3D&reserved=0> for publication as an Informational RFC.



Substantive comments and statements of support for publishing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.  This last call will end on 11th June 2019.



Thanks!



Jim & Joel







_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org<mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email