Re: [sfc] WG Adoption calls: two MD-1 drafts

"Paul Quinn (paulq)" <paulq@cisco.com> Thu, 30 November 2017 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <paulq@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8809012943D for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:40:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XxzdbVMOnjnF for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34D4128959 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 10:40:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1507; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1512067228; x=1513276828; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=XZipSaeHEp54Hn7Lx2yvk5Aq+fLAaGxuzsnz9BwHFyM=; b=kPYLlij5Hch1mq6RgifU+xP0MFnx5Gfewmm6lBeSqmB6/aaTeYhNBMJk PRZ1ESdblo175L8URZBj7U0tLqT4SNuQkO8tuN0DWLbW2X3yqZ08LbbbO 4p6U4xJkp4Y6RQpTmfjLkNOMu9DLUhmO8AZU4ZxRNYl9U5P4zCRSPQm/8 M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CHAgCETyBa/4cNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM8Zm4nB50LgVcmlnaCEQoYDYUWAoUhQRYBAQEBAQEBAQFrKIUfAQEBAwEBATg0CwULAgEIDgoeECcLJQIEDgWKGggQqDmKZgEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFg0GCCYFWghILgneFAAEBHoNGgjIFolsCh3KNHYIWhg+LLox6iR4CERkBgTkBJgMvgVFvFToqAYF+hFV4h0uBJIEUAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,341,1508803200"; d="scan'208";a="326956112"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 30 Nov 2017 18:40:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (xch-rcd-007.cisco.com [173.37.102.17]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAUIeRFM029449 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:40:27 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-008.cisco.com (173.37.102.18) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:40:26 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-008.cisco.com ([173.37.102.18]) by XCH-RCD-008.cisco.com ([173.37.102.18]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 12:40:26 -0600
From: "Paul Quinn (paulq)" <paulq@cisco.com>
To: Sumandra Majee <S.Majee@f5.com>
CC: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] WG Adoption calls: two MD-1 drafts
Thread-Index: AQHTaVe3Napbym+lm0yZbI/Kjs9RgaMr5tOAgAHAYgA=
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:40:26 +0000
Message-ID: <94A59F1E-2535-4F96-ABC4-4E0E382694BB@cisco.com>
References: <a4824833-03da-16e4-2d5e-b88757454d9c@joelhalpern.com> <DD96D8E1-216B-4483-8884-93EDF5EB5279@f5.com>
In-Reply-To: <DD96D8E1-216B-4483-8884-93EDF5EB5279@f5.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.131.118.30]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <EB5B01F4955A984BA4B646BFEA600944@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/LA2fcpkRIlz1bSjpUqB3w4x5qRc>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Adoption calls: two MD-1 drafts
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:40:30 -0000

+1

> On Nov 29, 2017, at 4:55 PM, Sumandra Majee <S.Majee@f5.com> wrote:
> 
> I support both.
> 
> On 11/29/17, 1:19 PM, "sfc on behalf of Joel M. Halpern" <sfc-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:
> 
>    EXTERNAL MAIL: sfc-bounces@ietf.org
> 
>    The WG chairs have been asked to issue calls for adoption for two of the 
>    MD-1 related drafts:
> 
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-napper-sfc-nsh-broadband-allocation/
> 
>    and
> 
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-dc-allocation/
> 
>    These documents aim for publication as Informational RFCs.
> 
>    As Jim is the coauthor on one of these two, I will be overseeing both 
>    adoption calls.
> 
>    Given that there are two last calls an two calls for working group 
>    adoption (see following emails) we are allowing 3 weeks for these calls.
> 
>    Please respond with either support or objection to the WG adopting 
>    either or both of these documents.
> 
>    We need to see feedback.  Silence does not imply consent.
>    We would prefer feedback with content.
> 
>    Thank you,
>    Joel
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    sfc mailing list
>    sfc@ietf.org
>    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc