Re: [sfc] WG Adoption calls: two MD-1 drafts

"Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> Thu, 21 December 2017 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA82129C6D for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:24:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=joelhalpern.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8tXzfaT0JQ7 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:24:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from maila2.tigertech.net (maila2.tigertech.net [208.80.4.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3F0B1241F3 for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:24:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C96BCA6C7C for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:24:39 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=joelhalpern.com; s=1.tigertech; t=1513880679; bh=I9+egpWew58q2k90+6/NIKEgGrRqyjEbez7lnwhpotQ=; h=Subject:From:To:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=YxX5YJBMYi8Tf9xcZRZbB3yV0uzQ64wz0IA4NCXrI1n9SQQb5GfJNbF9O8Oyqx2Qn paR6EvEtjLXraPdwxnyejSzVyzx9VCCCMwq4dQRETuGkohJE1lV4iIE7nT2TVOD2sh dC/VzHZvERuVOEP3ZFLfqZJ5f2GlxbDBEX0I33E8=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at maila2.tigertech.net
Received: from Joels-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [50.225.209.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by maila2.tigertech.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4411324030E for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 10:24:39 -0800 (PST)
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
To: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
References: <a4824833-03da-16e4-2d5e-b88757454d9c@joelhalpern.com>
Message-ID: <4ff4abb8-ea45-1704-b138-b39c293df310@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 13:24:38 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a4824833-03da-16e4-2d5e-b88757454d9c@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/vDmdYwUszvoskrYP6coxPeYwd80>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Adoption calls: two MD-1 drafts
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:24:41 -0000

This Adoption call has completed.
Based on the positive feedback, the working group has adopted these 
documents.

Authors, please submit new documents:
draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-broadband-allocation
     and
draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-dc-allocation.

Yours,
Joel

On 11/29/17 4:19 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> The WG chairs have been asked to issue calls for adoption for two of the 
> MD-1 related drafts:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-napper-sfc-nsh-broadband-allocation/
> 
> and
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-dc-allocation/
> 
> These documents aim for publication as Informational RFCs.
> 
> As Jim is the coauthor on one of these two, I will be overseeing both 
> adoption calls.
> 
> Given that there are two last calls an two calls for working group 
> adoption (see following emails) we are allowing 3 weeks for these calls.
> 
> Please respond with either support or objection to the WG adopting 
> either or both of these documents.
> 
> We need to see feedback.  Silence does not imply consent.
> We would prefer feedback with content.
> 
> Thank you,
> Joel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sfc mailing list
> sfc@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc
>