IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sfc] WG Adoption calls: two MD-1 drafts

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Thu, 30 November 2017 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sfc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E3812948D for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 06:01:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.519
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.519 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mvP_28RmVc35 for <sfc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 06:01:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257FC12949E for <sfc@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 06:01:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7112; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1512050471; x=1513260071; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=+XDK08xYgT3IQRx/jlHF/8APj8Opx2DZGCp1fEGRpts=; b=HakHAHUAbuiqqJvm37C0/+WflOIHbJIbKiN7DvBHbVkjkdZSj4Wt5lp8 9mbHtvoqFqRMMnzVQ0WnMt7Cbkl+He4CtCbSlv+IgikrXwParh9mPE09v sRQqcVXdhFUkhyJq8ivAWSo11ojR6G3ey+2YeEnP9KihQ73N+19vkxcaJ I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DbAAC3DiBa/4sNJK1cGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYM8Zm4nB4N4iiCOcpMohUuCEQoYAQyFFgIahQc/GAEBAQEBAQEBAWsohSACBAEBIUsLEAIBCD8DAgICJQsUEQIEDgWJPmQQpj+CJ4pmAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGAWDQYIJgVaCEoMCiDUxgjIFolsCh3KNHYIWhg+LLox6iR4CERkBgTkBHzmBUW8VOioBgX6EVXiIb4EUAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.45,341,1508803200"; d="scan'208,217"; a="37895562"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 30 Nov 2017 14:00:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (xch-rtp-016.cisco.com [64.101.220.156]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id vAUE0upC021535 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:00:56 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-016.cisco.com (64.101.220.156) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:00:55 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:00:55 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
CC: "sfc@ietf.org" <sfc@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sfc] WG Adoption calls: two MD-1 drafts
Thread-Index: AQHTaVe5+0C1gdUrV06cLra+5zXVRKMtSGgA
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:00:55 +0000
Message-ID: <B4ECCD19-C19D-48C0-A05E-6D64CF1F48AE@cisco.com>
References: <a4824833-03da-16e4-2d5e-b88757454d9c@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <a4824833-03da-16e4-2d5e-b88757454d9c@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.118.116.133]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B4ECCD19C19D48C0A05E6D64CF1F48AEciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sfc/Qo5i5mUqYbHTlzkJMobJP605P64>
Subject: Re: [sfc] WG Adoption calls: two MD-1 drafts
X-BeenThere: sfc@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Network Service Chaining <sfc.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sfc/>
List-Post: <mailto:sfc@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc>, <mailto:sfc-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:01:26 -0000

Joel,

I’ll look at this call and the other concurrent ones. But in the mean time, a quick question:

Should the WG attempt to advance the MD field definitions for MD-1 and MD-2 together as they apply to the same use-cases? For things like Tenant ID, Network ingress identification, etc.

Should there be a parallel call to https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-quinn-sfc-nsh-tlv/ ?

Thanks,

—
Carlos Pignataro, carlos@cisco.com<mailto:carlos@cisco.com>

“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis."

On Nov 29, 2017, at 4:19 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com<mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com>> wrote:

The WG chairs have been asked to issue calls for adoption for two of the MD-1 related drafts:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-napper-sfc-nsh-broadband-allocation/

and

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-guichard-sfc-nsh-dc-allocation/

These documents aim for publication as Informational RFCs.

As Jim is the coauthor on one of these two, I will be overseeing both adoption calls.

Given that there are two last calls an two calls for working group adoption (see following emails) we are allowing 3 weeks for these calls.

Please respond with either support or objection to the WG adopting either or both of these documents.

We need to see feedback.  Silence does not imply consent.
We would prefer feedback with content.

Thank you,
Joel

_______________________________________________
sfc mailing list
sfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sfc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email