Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops - ENDS: 2016-06-14 (June 14 2016)

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Thu, 09 June 2016 02:31 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881E912D0BA; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VWybdpuz7zo2; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18AD012D12F; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 19:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702BA28B0040; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:31:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEAF1F8055; Wed, 8 Jun 2016 22:31:15 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F14FA577-71D1-4A6A-8654-64221DA155F5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.2
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <yj9owpm8agia.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 22:19:54 -0400
Message-Id: <61339176-792E-4000-BBBD-D17D4962E249@tislabs.com>
References: <yj9owpm8agia.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net>
To: sidr <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/-2h52xQ6rFy7Fo1fnqDvaxZ3dEU>
Cc: sidr-ads@ietf.org, sidr chairs <sidr-chairs@ietf.org>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops - ENDS: 2016-06-14 (June 14 2016)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 02:31:18 -0000

No responses at all.

Come on folks.  It’s a short document, like Chris says.

You should be able to read and comment without much trouble.

—Sandy, speaking as one of the wg co-chairs

On Jun 1, 2016, at 2:52 PM, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> wrote:

> 
> Howdy WG folks,
> Please take this note as the start of the 2wk WGLC period for:
>  <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-07>
> 
> Abstract:
>  "Deployment of the BGPsec architecture and protocols has many
>   operational considerations.  This document attempts to collect and
>   present the most critical and universal.  It is expected to evolve as
>   BGPsec is formalized and initially deployed."
> 
> This is a relatively short document, 8 pages, full of wonder and
> excitement! I hope that the wg members have read it (it's been through
> 8+ revisions) and that they will re-read it quickly, provide comments
> as appropriate and ideas on preparedness for publication or not.
> 
> 
> Thanks for you time and attention to this matter,
> 
> -Chris
> co-chair-persona
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr