IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com> Fri, 20 May 2016 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <kent@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F43E12D90E for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 May 2016 05:53:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.627
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.627 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_HELO_HOME=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cAURR7_3KlJq for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 May 2016 05:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.bbn.com (smtp.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2EB612B03D for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 May 2016 05:53:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ssh.bbn.com ([192.1.122.15]:36851 helo=COMSEC.fios-router.home) by smtp.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <kent@bbn.com>) id 1b3jvV-000Dix-Vt for sidr@ietf.org; Fri, 20 May 2016 08:53:14 -0400
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
To: sidr@ietf.org
References: <20160518033754.24796.52937.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <f1770d7b-7a16-6bab-91f7-dd6e41bb60ff@innovationslab.net> <35AEF9F7-FFAD-470B-9D0D-1D7BE7C7FE90@ripe.net> <d4872829-f267-2297-0abc-4820bbde07ed@innovationslab.net> <CAKr6gn2dekUfo6EAORAnOck=U-FoFsXreZ43KDT3X8SBRWG3HA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <573F08B9.2010901@bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 08:53:14 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKr6gn2dekUfo6EAORAnOck=U-FoFsXreZ43KDT3X8SBRWG3HA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/-zORho9nO-8q7oOCV_gwo1ymZkM>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Terry Manderson's Discuss on draft-ietf-sidr-rpsl-sig-11: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 12:53:20 -0000

George,

I agree that it's more convenient to have the EE cert close to the
RPSL data being verified. Just so long as RPs use the RPKI to acquire
the cert path info, revocation status info, etc.

Steve

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email