IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Question about draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-03

Pradosh Mohapatra <pmohapat@cisco.com> Sun, 13 November 2011 17:23 UTC

Return-Path: <pmohapat@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A987E21F84C1 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:23:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KMnWI73p4rRn for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:23:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2093121F84A0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:23:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=pmohapat@cisco.com; l=511; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1321205023; x=1322414623; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=e/kzBNZ7EBXU7M6R9VNDiBJ2tBekxvznFBAwGB/Frko=; b=LMXi9bgvg0CfDodgjJPwCxXp/8glXXvwMZAgWKl/KjiYLwQyvxnGE0Yc 2ASz0Lk+Lfm2Xj7CnVEf5eCPeENLPuZbls4DKmf6DIt8VMt8FGr9A2ik3 Px9kGcULgKy1zuCrUQ37Imb9TvJuf8OnuPOe1XDXlWhXV4EL1HI80tAVF o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAF78v06rRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABCqXuBBYFyAQEBAwESASUCPwULCxI0SQ4GNYdgl0IBnTaJHGMEiBCMHpIa
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,503,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="13980054"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2011 17:23:43 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn7-850.cisco.com (sjc-vpn7-850.cisco.com [10.21.147.82]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id pADHNhJK023785; Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:23:43 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1075.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
From: Pradosh Mohapatra <pmohapat@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D9D1E72D-AF06-4F78-BE63-20CEF5973A1C@tcb.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 09:23:43 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <FDE060DA-EE53-4AC5-8814-DEA37A0441DB@cisco.com>
References: <E3CAD10A-758F-435F-B79F-62171DD373CC@tcb.net> <8893BDFC-6BF9-4AB9-9C8B-FCF00F37A621@cisco.com> <D9D1E72D-AF06-4F78-BE63-20CEF5973A1C@tcb.net>
To: Danny McPherson <danny@tcb.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1075.2)
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Question about draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-03
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:23:42 -0000

> I need some way to convey in iBGP it's preference relative to other
> BGP-learned paths - how do I do that today under this architecture,
> where if it were considered under the current algorithm it may well
> be labeled "Invalid", even if a mapping exists for the local AS and
> prefix in question?

Implementations mark it as valid today (unless the validation state  
extcomm says otherwise). Re. John's reply, it probably makes sense to  
clarify in the doc. Thanks for the comment.

- Pradosh

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email