Re: [sidr] Request for WG adoption

Matt Lepinski <mlepinsk@bbn.com> Tue, 04 August 2009 15:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mlepinsk@bbn.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A6328C3E0 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:19:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aff3LspLuoGF for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:19:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx3.bbn.com (mx3.bbn.com [128.33.1.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6941B28C405 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2009 08:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.89.254.130] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mx3.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <mlepinsk@bbn.com>) id 1MYLmS-0005CS-9i; Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:18:24 -0400
Message-ID: <4A7850B8.8060209@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 11:16:08 -0400
From: Matt Lepinski <mlepinsk@bbn.com>
Organization: BBN
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sandra Murphy <sandy@sparta.com>
References: <31E95EEC-0668-450F-8DBA-46503BDEE70A@apnic.net> <Pine.WNT.4.64.0907310924230.612@SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0907310924230.612@SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Sandy Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>, sidr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sidr] Request for WG adoption
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:19:48 -0000

Based on the discussion in Stockholm, this seems like the right way 
forward on algorithms.

I support adoption andam willing to review the draft.

- Matt Lepinski

Sandra Murphy wrote:

> I am opening a two week call for comments on this request for working 
> group adoption of draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.
>
> The draft is available at 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.
>
> As usual, the rules are that silence does not indicate assent, so 
> please actively reply.
>
> If you support adoption of this draft as a working group item, please 
> also indicate whether you will be able to work on the draft 
> (contribute or review).
>
> The call for adoption will end Friday, Aug 14, 2009.
>
> This is a call for adoption only, so comments on the contents are not 
> necessary or needed.
>
> --Sandy
>
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Geoff Huston wrote:
>
>> Hi Sandy,
>>
>> With my WG co-chair hat off I would like to request WG adoption of 
>> the draft draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.
>>
>> I believe that this document addresses WG concerns regarding how to 
>> specify algorithms and key sizes in the RPKI profile in a manner that 
>> does not over burden the CP nor require a re-issue of the certificate 
>> profile specification as and when changes to the algorithms and key 
>> sizes are considered prudent for the RPKI, as discussed in the WG 
>> meeting this week.
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>>  Geoff
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> sidr@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>