Re: [sidr] Request for WG adoption

The responses to this request have all been positive and include at least one author from every effected draft (all those that would have to change to point to the new draft).  I judge this to be consensus in the working group that the draft should be adopted as a working group draft.

--Sandy

________________________________

From: Murphy, Sandra
Sent: Fri 7/31/2009 9:30 AM
To: sidr@ietf.org
Cc: Sandy Murphy
Subject: [sidr] Request for WG adoption

I am opening a two week call for comments on this request for working
group adoption of draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.

The draft is available at
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.

As usual, the rules are that silence does not indicate assent, so please
actively reply.

If you support adoption of this draft as a working group item, please also
indicate whether you will be able to work on the draft (contribute or
review).

The call for adoption will end Friday, Aug 14, 2009.

This is a call for adoption only, so comments on the contents are not
necessary or needed.

--Sandy

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Geoff Huston wrote:

> Hi Sandy,
>
> With my WG co-chair hat off I would like to request WG adoption of the draft
> draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.
>
> I believe that this document addresses WG concerns regarding how to specify
> algorithms and key sizes in the RPKI profile in a manner that does not over
> burden the CP nor require a re-issue of the certificate profile specification
> as and when changes to the algorithms and key sizes are considered prudent
> for the RPKI, as discussed in the WG meeting this week.
>
>
> thanks,
>
>  Geoff
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr