[sidr] Request for WG adoption

Sandra Murphy <sandy@sparta.com> Fri, 31 July 2009 13:30 UTC

Return-Path: <Sandra.Murphy@cobham.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9F33A6E21 for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EFqNE5FXoxxL for <sidr@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from M4.sparta.com (M4.sparta.com [157.185.61.2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEDB03A6E56 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 06:30:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Beta5.sparta.com (beta5.sparta.com [157.185.63.21]) by M4.sparta.com (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id n6VDUVKt019848; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:30:31 -0500
Received: from nemo.columbia.ads.sparta.com (nemo.columbia.sparta.com [157.185.80.75]) by Beta5.sparta.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6VDUVsC018315; Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:30:31 -0500
Received: from SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com ([157.185.248.8]) by nemo.columbia.ads.sparta.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:30:30 -0400
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:30:26 -0400
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@sparta.com>
To: sidr@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <31E95EEC-0668-450F-8DBA-46503BDEE70A@apnic.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.0907310924230.612@SANDYM-LT.columbia.ads.sparta.com>
References: <31E95EEC-0668-450F-8DBA-46503BDEE70A@apnic.net>
X-X-Sender: sandy@nemo.columbia.sparta.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jul 2009 13:30:30.0719 (UTC) FILETIME=[12FB54F0:01CA11E3]
Cc: Sandy Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: [sidr] Request for WG adoption
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:30:30 -0000

I am opening a two week call for comments on this request for working 
group adoption of draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.

The draft is available at 
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.

As usual, the rules are that silence does not indicate assent, so please 
actively reply.

If you support adoption of this draft as a working group item, please also 
indicate whether you will be able to work on the draft (contribute or 
review).

The call for adoption will end Friday, Aug 14, 2009.

This is a call for adoption only, so comments on the contents are not 
necessary or needed.

--Sandy

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Geoff Huston wrote:

> Hi Sandy,
>
> With my WG co-chair hat off I would like to request WG adoption of the draft 
> draft-huston-sidr-rpki-algs-00.txt.
>
> I believe that this document addresses WG concerns regarding how to specify 
> algorithms and key sizes in the RPKI profile in a manner that does not over 
> burden the CP nor require a re-issue of the certificate profile specification 
> as and when changes to the algorithms and key sizes are considered prudent 
> for the RPKI, as discussed in the WG meeting this week.
>
>
> thanks,
>
>  Geoff
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr