IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview ENDING: 10/21/2015)

Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> Thu, 08 October 2015 13:54 UTC

Return-Path: <sandy@tislabs.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D711B33E8; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 06:54:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4CuN_pgPf6AA; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 06:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from walnut.tislabs.com (walnut.tislabs.com [192.94.214.200]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 961911B3407; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 06:54:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nova.tislabs.com (unknown [10.66.1.77]) by walnut.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2B728B0046; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:54:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by nova.tislabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DD91F8035; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:54:25 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_25DEF612-5BAF-4883-95DF-74AC1188A1C8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5.1
From: Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
In-Reply-To: <22F64DA2-03A5-4B52-A897-B591A4EC01FB@tislabs.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 09:54:25 -0400
Message-Id: <CA6807CB-F46E-4745-8E02-96D5CE5BC1D5@tislabs.com>
References: <yj9osi5mae4p.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <BAB8D720-5B2E-4197-857F-6DF24E31DCF1@sn3rd.com> <22F64DA2-03A5-4B52-A897-B591A4EC01FB@tislabs.com>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/7j2N6tk2Mw_3Rt1D3HuFWWFwQQI>
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>, sidr-chairs@ietf.org, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview ENDING: 10/21/2015)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 13:54:28 -0000

On Oct 8, 2015, at 5:14 AM, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com> wrote:

> 
> On Oct 7, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
>> We’ll need to figure out what to do about the I-D.sidr-as-migration reference it’s in the “IESG Dead” state.
> 
> Thanks for the heads up, we’ll investigate with the AD.

The answer from the AD is:

   The system changed it to Dead from "AD is Watching" when the draft expired.

   In any case, all "Dead" means is that the IESG is not tracking the document, not that we're in fact killing it.


—Sandy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email