Re: [sidr] WGLC: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-overview ENDING: 10/21/2015)

[Samuel Weiler <[e-mail]>]

The doc cites a bunch of i-d's.  Under previous practice, that would have 
left it languishing in the RFC Editor queue waiting for the others.  If 
that were the practice now, I would suggest we hold it and release all of 
the docs as a group, which would permit later changes to this doc if 
needed.  I think current practice does allow citing i-d's (though version 
numbers need to be specified), but I'm wondering if we wouldn't be better 
off waiting.  This is the first BGPsec doc many will read - I would prefer 
to have it be correct and complete even if we make changes in the other 
docs along the way.

Other than that, no issues with the doc - it's in good shape.

Minor nits sent separately to the editors.

-- Sam Weiler