Re: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt
Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com> Tue, 13 October 2015 13:27 UTC
Return-Path: <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2126C1B3149 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8iboEF4rIBLT for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DEF31B2A1C for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so58217791wic.0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:27:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=9XLKPOmYeceLGJyymU6Q10RF8h+KyEhUHvCIrARI09g=; b=tUDFxT8A4mlfFn3LNy2cGarQMQvRCFNp8vwQI+uUjWlwtpXZNEVBNcGxkH9sMMrQc/ 7AzAIkxN/cWJZLaFXq0grw9LpPG6Ln63TRSX0EuyvckgWWBUEQd+xP28+1whyC3lvBuU 4m7BIoExXK5x8gKONNlXQlDvR9ZPinkwAEmes/inney+vpq803+EQDvuy3pjFhH/dglv T+bznlk8xuBysNI5+INBeGVjNkP3AbE1oY6YPuDSfpX6uzoWbNnoYVpDCieEqWn4oV1y 4QvgyuPdmfBnPjrbP9cpgjjh4IyYKPfS8aJKXNOZXYQyT39zOphI3oWhqmXtvsnzA+pB H8aQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.205.229 with SMTP id lj5mr16677450wjc.57.1444742857912; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 06:27:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20151009170650.4800.42354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4FC98452-5859-4A7B-ABA2-9281CB27FC15@apnic.net> <B04829F7-0065-4E8A-B8D1-677B23B092B1@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <B04829F7-0065-4E8A-B8D1-677B23B092B1@apnic.net>
From: Arturo Servin <arturo.servin@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:27:27 +0000
Message-ID: <CALo9H1Yc9OF4eWchoOBspLsfZ4DZcUHtwVuRUCjjKutUFQasGw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7ba984b8d6789f0521fc68e5"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/Bx3R5jtyM2F9i0soe9H4DFenkPQ>
Cc: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: Re: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 13:27:42 -0000
Hi Something that I liked from draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered is that it explained very well why we need to change the validation process. Although it is not mandatory and I do not have a strong position about it, I think it would be good to add some context to this document of why the change. /as On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 at 18:25 Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote: > sorry - forgot to add the url for this draft - here tis: > > > A new version of I-D, draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Geoff Huston and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-huston-sidr-validity > Revision: 00 > Title: Update to RPKI Validation > Document date: 2015-10-09 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 6 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huston-sidr-validity/ > Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-sidr-validity-00 > > > Abstract: > This document updates the RPKI certificate validation procedure as > specified in Section 7.2 of RFC6487. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat > > > > > On 9 Oct 2015, at 1:23 PM, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > We were about to ask the WG chairs for a WG Last Call on this document, > but then noticed that this is an informational document and its attempting > to update a standards track RFC > > > > We suspect that the best case is to instead look at a precise standards > track document that describes the update to the validation procedure > described RFC6487 and would be a clear candidate for Standards Track itself. > > > > So draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt is that draft. > > > > WG Chairs:- We would like to request WG adoption of > draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt, on the understanding that > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered has done its work and should > be allowed to expire gracefully in a corner at this point! > > > > > > regards, > > > > Geoff & George > > > > > > > > > >> On 9 Oct 2015, at 1:06 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > >> This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working > Group of the IETF. > >> > >> Title : RPKI Validation Reconsidered > >> Authors : Geoff Huston > >> George Michaelson > >> Carlos M. Martinez > >> Tim Bruijnzeels > >> Andrew Lee Newton > >> Alain Aina > >> Filename : > draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-02.txt > >> Pages : 12 > >> Date : 2015-10-09 > >> > >> Abstract: > >> This document reviews the certificate validation procedure specified > >> in RFC6487 and highlights aspects of operational fragility in the > >> management of certificates in the RPKI. > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered/ > >> > >> There's also a htmlized version available at: > >> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-02 > >> > >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-02 > >> > >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> sidr mailing list > >> sidr@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sidr mailing list > > sidr@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sidr mailing list > > sidr@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr > > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > sidr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr >
- [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validatio… internet-drafts
- Re: [sidr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-valid… Geoff Huston
- Re: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.… Geoff Huston
- [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt Geoff Huston
- Re: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.… Arturo Servin
- Re: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.… Geoff Huston
- Re: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.… Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)