Re: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt

["Roque Gagliano (rogaglia)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Geoff,

In many cases we publish an Appendix on update documents detailing the
changes from previous version and given the rational that Arturo mentioned.

Roque

‹ 
Roque Gagliano
Tail-f Solutions Architect Southern Europe
[phone]






On 13/10/15 20:06, "sidr on behalf of Geoff Huston" <[e-mail]
on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:

>I think that a standards track document that updates a specification
>should be precisely and exactly that. Note that the document it updates
>contains no rationale for its many design decisions.
>
>This does not stop an informational document being published that contains
>the discussion of the rationale for the change, but I think it better to
>keep
>the desired change to the specification as succinct and as focussed as
>possible
>
>thanks,
>
>  Geoff
>
>
>> On 14 Oct 2015, at 12:27 AM, Arturo Servin <[e-mail]>
>>wrote:
>> 
>> Hi
>> 
>> Something that I liked from
>>draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered is that it explained very
>>well why we need to change the validation process. Although it is not
>>mandatory and I do not have a strong position about it, I think it would
>>be good to add some context to this document of why the change.
>> 
>> /as
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 at 18:25 Geoff Huston <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> sorry - forgot to add the url for this draft - here tis:
>> 
>> 
>> A new version of I-D, draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt
>> has been successfully submitted by Geoff Huston and posted to the
>> IETF repository.
>> 
>> Name:           draft-huston-sidr-validity
>> Revision:       00
>> Title:          Update to RPKI Validation
>> Document date:  2015-10-09
>> Group:          Individual Submission
>> Pages:          6
>> URL:            
>>https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt
>> Status:         
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-huston-sidr-validity/
>> Htmlized:       
>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huston-sidr-validity-00
>> 
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>   This document updates the RPKI certificate validation procedure as
>>   specified in Section 7.2 of RFC6487.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> 
>> The IETF Secretariat
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> > On 9 Oct 2015, at 1:23 PM, Geoff Huston <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > We were about to ask the WG chairs for a WG Last Call on this
>>document, but then noticed that this is an informational document and
>>its attempting to update a standards track RFC
>> >
>> > We suspect that the best case is to instead look at a precise
>>standards track document that describes the update to the validation
>>procedure described RFC6487 and would be a clear candidate for Standards
>>Track itself.
>> >
>> > So draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt is that draft.
>> >
>> > WG Chairs:- We would like to request WG adoption of
>>draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt, on the understanding that
>>draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered has done its work and
>>should be allowed to expire gracefully in a corner at this point!
>> >
>> >
>> > regards,
>> >
>> >    Geoff & George
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 9 Oct 2015, at 1:06 PM, [e-mail] wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>directories.
>> >> This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working
>>Group of the IETF.
>> >>
>> >>      Title           : RPKI Validation Reconsidered
>> >>      Authors         : Geoff Huston
>> >>                        George Michaelson
>> >>                        Carlos M. Martinez
>> >>                        Tim Bruijnzeels
>> >>                        Andrew Lee Newton
>> >>                        Alain Aina
>> >>      Filename        :
>>draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-02.txt
>> >>      Pages           : 12
>> >>      Date            : 2015-10-09
>> >>
>> >> Abstract:
>> >> This document reviews the certificate validation procedure specified
>> >> in RFC6487 and highlights aspects of operational fragility in the
>> >> management of certificates in the RPKI.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> >> 
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsid
>>ered/
>> >>
>> >> There's also a htmlized version available at:
>> >> 
>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-
>>02
>> >>
>> >> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> >> 
>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsi
>>dered-02
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>submission
>> >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>> >>
>> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> sidr mailing list
>> >> [e-mail]
>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sidr mailing list
>> > [e-mail]
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sidr mailing list
>> > [e-mail]
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> sidr mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
>
>_______________________________________________
>sidr mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr