IETF Logo Mail Archive

[sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt

Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Fri, 09 October 2015 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FC51B48F9 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.801
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.801 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MlToldhbknUc for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:24:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nx-mailgw.apnic.net (nx-mailgw.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dd8:9:801::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EB131B48F0 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer:return-path; bh=HvDIYdzBKkV4hCogEFtFWHoQVYHpnkQN4S9NIp7E6G4=; b=WGhkY+D8YF1kVBjgATxu4n6EPi7cGufT79LK9u6qpwE7PQbJMHzvRKfCYWvxH0KqgMdp3XwOBsf4Y TTJRgFAnVjZCHnKyyb2UIclqqimr7GlOunCgNEGp9F8RKFMoiBIIz/KcHLxKUd9DmluRH6obX7YUWe CHEopVU3MQVi3cWg=
Received: from NXMDA2.org.apnic.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:dd8:9:2::101:249]) by nx-mailgw.apnic.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPS; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 03:24:10 +1000 (AEST)
Received: from [172.16.137.34] (203.119.101.249) by NXMDA2.org.apnic.net (203.119.107.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 03:26:32 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.0 \(3094\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <20151009170650.4800.42354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 13:23:52 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <4FC98452-5859-4A7B-ABA2-9281CB27FC15@apnic.net>
References: <20151009170650.4800.42354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3094)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/Sxkht1Idr1Iz59ZoQ0y8w2bDQwE>
Cc: Christopher Morrow <christopher.morrow@gmail.com>, George Michaelson <ggm@apnic.net>, Sandra Murphy <sandy@tislabs.com>
Subject: [sidr] posted: draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:24:06 -0000

Hi,

We were about to ask the WG chairs for a WG Last Call on this document, but then noticed that this is an informational document and its attempting to update a standards track RFC

We suspect that the best case is to instead look at a precise standards track document that describes the update to the validation procedure described RFC6487 and would be a clear candidate for Standards Track itself.

So draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt is that draft.

WG Chairs:- We would like to request WG adoption of draft-huston-sidr-validity-00.txt, on the understanding that draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered has done its work and should be allowed to expire gracefully in a corner at this point!


regards,

    Geoff & George




> On 9 Oct 2015, at 1:06 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> 
> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Secure Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>       Title           : RPKI Validation Reconsidered
>       Authors         : Geoff Huston
>                         George Michaelson
>                         Carlos M. Martinez
>                         Tim Bruijnzeels
>                         Andrew Lee Newton
>                         Alain Aina
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 12
> 	Date            : 2015-10-09
> 
> Abstract:
>  This document reviews the certificate validation procedure specified
>  in RFC6487 and highlights aspects of operational fragility in the
>  management of certificates in the RPKI.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-02
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-validation-reconsidered-02
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email