IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 04 January 2017 03:02 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3276612952B; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:02:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DcwEirDcUNq3; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:8006::18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30C51129448; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1cObpr-0006vK-Mn; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 03:01:56 +0000
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:01:53 +0900
Message-ID: <m27f6bmsta.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
In-Reply-To: <35FB8869-1BCE-4C3B-9546-2581EC79F868@kuehlewind.net>
References: <148336377615.21819.15119186800162780376.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2vatxmv83.wl-randy@psg.com> <563AAA29-82F7-4202-8A54-855CD7702595@kuehlewind.net> <m2tw9hmq76.wl-randy@psg.com> <yj9o60lx6kvm.wl%morrowc@ops-netman.net> <m2shp0nct9.wl-randy@psg.com> <9A40617C-EB4E-40FD-A8D2-65C292BAC08A@cisco.com> <35FB8869-1BCE-4C3B-9546-2581EC79F868@kuehlewind.net>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/24.5 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidr/JZosJjC6xwmRXloCtVW8F1SeXPE>
Cc: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidr/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 03:02:02 -0000

> Agreed. I guess you could in addition be very clear that a router that
> once negotiated (and/or send) BGPsec (attributes) should not be
> expected to always do so.

whoops!  that'll be in -14.  thanks.

randy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email