[sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02
Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 12 December 2012 19:56 UTC
Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9E421E80F4 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:56:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.102, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZkQMB0O+0uzO for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from statler.isode.com (statler.isode.com [62.3.217.254]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE6021E808D for <sidr@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:56:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1355342192; d=isode.com; s=selector; i=@isode.com; bh=vy/7AsqKosfwDGGxw8lhOYsMaWeepmzGzqcczbhG3d0=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=XWoq13omDkGpzMt4146bUiDkEUABeByZb/XdK3UZ57AIxnwlpKAjjpnjw7WpPrBcQU2xLK fsK86EcdBqgbml166UbyeCocRyreINkdJv9P5Qfv/YjJ8Dvcn73e1MlufqGkTtxF9QJHvK xOh7NmKzjhvlpebUc9ZdS22RpK+VjWs=;
Received: from [172.16.1.29] (shiny.isode.com [62.3.217.250]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <UMjhcABRrwla@statler.isode.com>; Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:56:32 +0000
Message-ID: <50C8E17D.3090507@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:56:45 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
To: sidr wg <sidr@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 19:56:34 -0000
Dear WG participants, I would like to initiate 2+ weeks poll (ending on December 31st 2012) regarding acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02.txt. Please reply to questions listed below. Send your replies to the mailing list or directly to WG chairs <sidr-chairs@tools.ietf.org>. I would like to avoid extended discussions of technical issues at this time, as I think people already made up their minds. However including pointers to earlier discussions is fine. Alexey, on behald of SIDR chairs. ---------------- 1) Is the problem described/solved by draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02 actually a problem that the WG needs to address? (Answer: yes or no. Additional information is welcomed, but I don't want people to repeat the whole discussion.) 2) If you answered "yes" to the question #1, please also answer the following question: Is draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02 a reasonable starting point to become a WG document? Please choose one of the following: a) Ready for Adoption (whether or not you have some specific issues with it. Also, this answer is unrelated to whether this should be a separate draft or a part of an existing draft). b) Needs more work BEFORE Adoption c) Should not be adopted. In particular this mean that you don't believe any amount of work on the proposed draft will address your issues. So any solution to this problem should be a new draft written from scratch. d) Abstain/don't care 3) If you answered "a" or "b" above, please also answer the following question: Does this need to be in a standalone draft, or can it be incorporated into another existing WG draft? When answering this question please only base your answer on technical reasons, in particular please leave the decision on who is going to edit the document (if it is standalone) to WG chairs.
- [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-gra… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki… Warren Kumari
- Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki… Byron Ellacott
- Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki… Terry Manderson
- Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki… Stephen Kent
- Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki… George, Wes
- Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki… Andy Newton
- Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki… Alexey Melnikov