Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02

[Stephen Kent <[e-mail]>]

> ----------------
>
> 1) Is the problem described/solved by 
> draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02 actually a problem that the WG needs 
> to address? (Answer: yes or no. Additional information is welcomed, 
> but I don't want people to repeat the whole discussion.)
yes.
>
> 2) If you answered "yes" to the question #1, please also answer the 
> following question:
>
> Is draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02 a reasonable starting point to 
> become a WG document? Please choose one of the following:
>
>
> a) Ready for Adoption (whether or not you have some specific issues 
> with it. Also, this answer is unrelated to whether this should be a 
> separate draft or a part of an existing draft).
NO
>
> b) Needs more work BEFORE Adoption
X
>
> c) Should not be adopted. In particular this mean that you don't 
> believe any amount of work on the proposed draft will address your 
> issues. So any solution to this problem should be a new draft written 
> from scratch.
>
> d) Abstain/don't care
>
>
> 3) If you answered "a" or "b" above, please also answer the following 
> question:
>
> Does this need to be in a standalone draft, or can it be incorporated 
> into another existing WG draft? When answering this question please 
> only base your answer on technical reasons, in particular please leave 
> the decision on who is going to edit the document (if it is 
> standalone) to WG chairs.

I don't recall another, extant WG draft with which this might be combined.

Steve