IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Fri, 21 December 2012 15:44 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC6C21F87B3 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:44:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OWfJUtK++Iub for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp1.arin.net (smtp1.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303B721F8866 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 07:44:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id D11E81652BC; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:44:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (chaxch06.corp.arin.net [192.149.252.95]) by smtp1.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5057D1652B1; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:44:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.19) by CHAXCH06.corp.arin.net (192.149.252.95) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.283.3; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:43:43 -0500
Received: from CHAXCH01.corp.arin.net ([169.254.1.55]) by CHAXCH04.corp.arin.net ([10.1.30.19]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Fri, 21 Dec 2012 10:44:04 -0500
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, sidr wg <sidr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02
Thread-Index: AQHN2KLM3f/nnoS0IkuLdXXUmdVtzJgjcriA
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:44:03 +0000
Message-ID: <62D9228640AC7F49B2DD9ED0C9CE60E57898D42A@CHAXCH01.corp.arin.net>
In-Reply-To: <50C8E17D.3090507@isode.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
x-originating-ip: [10.1.1.56]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <082AAE07F49D8D4C9EE2EC20894C13D9@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [sidr] Poll: WG acceptance of draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:44:08 -0000

On 12/12/12 2:56 PM, "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:

>1) Is the problem described/solved by draft-ymbk-rpki-grandparenting-02
>actually a problem that the WG needs to address? (Answer: yes or no.
>Additional information is welcomed, but I don't want people to repeat
>the whole discussion.)

At present, I think not. While this is interesting, I don't think the IETF
is the venue for this document as the subject is not technical.

>3) If you answered "a" or "b" above, please also answer the following
>question:
>
>Does this need to be in a standalone draft, or can it be incorporated
>into another existing WG draft? When answering this question please only
>base your answer on technical reasons, in particular please leave the
>decision on who is going to edit the document (if it is standalone) to
>WG chairs.

Should it be adopted, I think it should be standalone.

-andy

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email