Re: [sidr] adopt a mib

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Sat, 06 August 2011 15:42 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C768A21F85E3 for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.325, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, HOST_EQ_DIALUP=0.862, RCVD_IN_PBL=0.905, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GJ38FFUyjjl for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 990DC21F85CE for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:42:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.102] (r186-48-217-161.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy [186.48.217.161]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85F57308447 for <sidr@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Aug 2011 12:42:50 -0300 (UYT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1108051639160.1356@mw-PC>
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:42:49 -0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <823D382E-CEEC-419B-B80C-3B09F957BA21@lacnic.net>
References: <m2d3gkepg8.wl%randy@psg.com> <Pine.WNT.4.64.1108051639160.1356@mw-PC>
To: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Subject: Re: [sidr] adopt a mib
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2011 15:42:43 -0000

	Support.

	Some comments.

	Roque previously mentioned something similar, for me it's a bit confusing to talk about ROAs validity in a router. In my mind ROAs are validated somewhere else and in routers you search for the validity of a prefix which I think what is referenced here.

	Also, as Robert Raszuk mentioned I am a bit concerned that in order to get the validity of a prefix first I need to get a table with ~400k entries. I do not normally get a full table BGP via SNMP so may be my concern is unjustified by my lack of experience. May be is it just the way it is with SNMP and we need to live with it.

Cheers,
-as


On 5 Aug 2011, at 11:39, Matthias Waehlisch wrote:

> 
> On Fri, 5 Aug 2011, Randy Bush wrote:
> 
>> i would request the wg adopt
>> 
>>    draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib
>>    draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib
>> 
> 
> I support the adoption, as well.
> 
> 
> Cheers
>  matthias
> 
> -- 
> Matthias Waehlisch
> .  Freie Universitaet Berlin, Inst. fuer Informatik, AG CST
> .  Takustr. 9, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
> .. mailto:waehlisch@ieee.org .. http://www.inf.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
> :. Also: http://inet.cpt.haw-hamburg.de .. http://www.link-lab.net
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr