IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sidr] adopt a mib

Roque Gagliano <rogaglia@cisco.com> Thu, 04 August 2011 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <rogaglia@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A1711E807F for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X6TjqhSEg9jg for <sidr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:38:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B030011E807C for <sidr@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 16:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=rogaglia@cisco.com; l=7083; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1312501117; x=1313710717; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to; bh=/1gASNjgbO721FU9mj7RCkN950Ra+N8kxwIIKItaey8=; b=DEJA0q6FxW4D/B5dgCR1spLpqG0mLAXJ2BMr4qLxVhSQAxu+Rl8sKh1Z PwCZ18IlR1YI9KANid3RcTmo2gIZsiJwNd6ZcIEUOkJ1e1Z8gHYOkT3Uu 9oK5zEU0DHm+8CSNK8umAarO7X4iKxFfUAdJ9RLGtp7isKewSlv3MFbIo g=;
X-Files: smime.p7s : 4389
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EAAstO06Q/khN/2dsb2JhbABDp2t3gUABAQEBAgEBAQEPAVsLBQsLRgIlMAYTIodKBKJLAZ5dhWNfBJJ7kGY
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.67,320,1309737600"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="46709398"
Received: from ams-core-4.cisco.com ([144.254.72.77]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Aug 2011 23:38:36 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp7896.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp7896.cisco.com [10.61.94.215]) by ams-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p74NcZWq001780; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 23:38:35 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail-653--813533496"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"
From: Roque Gagliano <rogaglia@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2d3gkepg8.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:38:34 +0200
Message-Id: <C0E26DF8-49F5-4B3D-9A4F-73068ED913CD@cisco.com>
References: <m2d3gkepg8.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: sidr wg list <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sidr] adopt a mib
X-BeenThere: sidr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Secure Interdomain Routing <sidr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sidr>
List-Post: <mailto:sidr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr>, <mailto:sidr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 23:38:21 -0000

I support adoption of both documents with one comment:
On "draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib", I would not use the word "ROATable". The router does not interact with ROAs and I believe it is confusing.
In  "draft-ietf-sidr-pfx-validate-02", the same table is referred as: "pfx_validate_table".

Roque



> i would request the wg adopt
> 
>    draft-ymbk-bgp-origin-validation-mib
>    draft-ymbk-rpki-rtr-protocol-mib
> 
> yes, they are works in progress.  but that's what a wg is for.
> 
> fwiw, bert is hacking away.  expect fuller work in a week.
> 
> randy
> _______________________________________________
> sidr mailing list
> sidr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email