Re: [Sidrops] WG ADOPTION - draft-madi-sidrops-rush

Yunan,

> 2020年10月9日 14:41，Guyunan <guyunan@huawei.com> 写道：
> 
> Seems quite useful for local management of validated cache. A small suggestion, maybe the authors can further clarify the use of HTTP and HTTPs, whether HTTPs is mandatory, or it’s optional using either HTTP only or HTTPs.  

A very good catch.

I think https is default at least as it is used in the name of this draft literally.

But I see a potential that http can work if IPsec has been established between two cache servers.

We can discuss it further if adopted as a WG item.

Di

>  
> Support adoption.
>  
> BR,
>  
> Yunan
>  
> From: Sidrops [mailto:sidrops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Melchior Aelmans
> Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2020 12:51 AM
> To: Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>
> Cc: SIDROps Chairs <sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>; SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>; sidrops-ads@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WG ADOPTION - draft-madi-sidrops-rush - ENDS 10/12/2020 (Oct 12th)
>  
> As a co-author I support adoption by the WG.
>  
> THanks!
> Melchior
>  
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 6:38 AM Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net> wrote:
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> Please consider this the start of a WG Adoption call for the subject
> draft, the abstract of which is:
> 
>   "This document defines a method for transferring RPKI validated cache
>    update information in JSON object format over HTTPs."
> 
> The URL of which is:
>   https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-madi-sidrops-rush-02
> 
> Please give this a read-through and consider if the work is appropriate
> for the WG to work on.
> 
> thanks!
> -chris
> co-chair-persona
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops
> _______________________________________________
> Sidrops mailing list
> Sidrops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops