Re: [Sidrops] WG ADOPTION - draft-madi-sidrops-rush - ENDS 10/12/2020 (Oct 12th)

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Wed, 18 November 2020 06:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C903A0BDB; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:54:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6G67ZeY-S1M2; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:54:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E6C23A0BD7; Tue, 17 Nov 2020 22:54:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.129] (unknown [23.138.112.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 542CC540121; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 01:54:15 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.20.0.2.21\))
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <D77FB6ED-2288-4E55-8329-27EC52C8BB37@rpstir.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 01:54:14 -0500
Cc: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>, SIDROps Chairs <sidrops-chairs@ietf.org>, "sidrops-ads@ietf.org" <sidrops-ads@ietf.org>, Guyunan <guyunan@huawei.com>, SIDR Operations WG <sidrops@ietf.org>, Melchior Aelmans <melchior@aelmans.eu>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <95A9B418-370C-43F5-8466-3FC157C3F914@puck.nether.net>
References: <87imbybjne.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net> <CALxNLBhjU409LB8pU3Dr287hyKDSW8bHbJiLNPjf4yOSnzc2kg@mail.gmail.com> <C01B0098369B2D4391851938DA6700B717C1D699@DGGEML532-MBX.china.huawei.com> <C4FE2995-87D4-4FF5-9F3D-91D5BE44ED33@rpstir.net> <CAL9jLaZAC9soiJKy856dWexjAmh5=brBnnUOrUjeSHLR_CKJTQ@mail.gmail.com> <3B7B607B-C100-4805-94BE-DC2F597A3CD2@rpstir.net> <87a6vgfb3i.wl-morrowc@ops-netman.net> <X7PYnV3pz9QO5NUY@bench.sobornost.net> <D77FB6ED-2288-4E55-8329-27EC52C8BB37@rpstir.net>
To: Di Ma <madi@rpstir.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.20.0.2.21)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/F8VWjCAD_gctbK0CWoVewGUg3Jc>
Subject: Re: [Sidrops] WG ADOPTION - draft-madi-sidrops-rush - ENDS 10/12/2020 (Oct 12th)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 06:54:20 -0000


> On Nov 18, 2020, at 1:48 AM, Di Ma <madi@rpstir.net> wrote:
> 
> We don’t make decision for operators but offer them a choice that they can outsource valiation if they have no problem with this fashion.

Is it perhaps better to think about offering validation as a service to people who can’t or are unable to run their own validators?

(Thinking of how people may decide to use an off-network DNS resolver so they don’t need to operate one themselves).

Perhaps this is something larger networks may want to offer to their customers, similar to how they may offer NTP, DNS and other services?

- Jared