IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Sidrops] Talk: RPKI Deployment: Status, Challenges and the Learning-Validator

Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de> Mon, 17 July 2017 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9662B131C30 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i_VZZK245o92 for <sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:37:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A4F1131C2D for <sidrops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 07:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) for sidrops@ietf.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1dX78r-000xVV-4Q>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:36:57 +0200
Received: from dhcp-80a7.meeting.ietf.org ([31.133.128.167] helo=mw-x1.meeting.ietf.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) for sidrops@ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (envelope-from <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>) id <1dX78q-00328B-S6>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:36:57 +0200
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 16:36:55 +0200
From: Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
To: sidrops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1707171628150.10844@mw-x1>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (WNT 1167 2008-08-23)
X-X-Sender: waehl@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.DE
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-Originating-IP: 31.133.128.167
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/1blpdagt9E0rdi9JQlGDm-BJbUM>
Subject: [Sidrops] Talk: RPKI Deployment: Status, Challenges and the Learning-Validator
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 14:37:05 -0000

two comments via the list because we run out of time:

(1) I'm wondering about the statement that the quality of ROAs decreases 
over time. My impression is that the quality improved because of 
excellent training by RIRs and others.

Slide 4 shows absolute values, which is not helpful in this context.


(2) Regarding ROV measurements: "Similar results apparently from 
measurements by Randy Bush and others (didn't yet see details)"

Details are available, easy to find using Google:

* "Towards a Rigorous Methodology for Measuring Adoption of RPKI Route 
Validation and Filtering", https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04263. Some of 
this work was also presented at the last RIPE meeting: 
https://ripe74.ripe.net/archives/video/46/




Cheers
  matthias

-- 
Matthias Waehlisch
.  Freie Universitaet Berlin, Computer Science
.. http://www.cs.fu-berlin.de/~waehl

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email