[Sidrops] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 30 April 2019 03:59 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: sidrops@ietf.org
Delivered-To: sidrops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAE0E1207D5; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:59:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases@ietf.org, Chris Morrow <morrowc@ops-netman.net>, sidrops-chairs@ietf.org, morrowc@ops-netman.net, sidrops@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.95.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <155659678989.12846.6228625087288154485.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:59:49 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sidrops/8BTrhMg74PxypES_8KUJHy1Pjxc>
Subject: [Sidrops] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sidrops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: A list for the SIDR Operations WG <sidrops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sidrops/>
List-Post: <mailto:sidrops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidrops>, <mailto:sidrops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 03:59:50 -0000

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-sidrops-lta-use-cases/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work on this document. I have two minor editorial suggestions.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please expand the following acronyms upon first use and in the title;
see https://www.rfc-editor.org/materials/abbrev.expansion.txt for guidance.

 - RPKI
 - LIR
 - PI
 - RIR
 - CA

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

ID Nits reports:

  ** The document seems to lack a both a reference to RFC 2119 and the
     recommended RFC 2119 boilerplate, even if it appears to use RFC 2119
     keywords.

     RFC 2119 keyword, line 177: '...eds.  Hence they MUST be implemented t...'

Please consider adding the boilerplate specified in RFC 8174.