IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sieve] New Version Notification for draft-george-sieve-vacation-time-00

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Thu, 04 February 2010 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: sieve@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0453A6ABD for <sieve@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:42:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.493
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.493 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Zf32i6eNlzW for <sieve@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:42:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rufus.isode.com (rufus.isode.com [62.3.217.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B453A69BB for <sieve@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:42:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [92.40.97.88] (92.40.97.88.sub.mbb.three.co.uk [92.40.97.88]) by rufus.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPA id <S2qWuABCzqY8@rufus.isode.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:43:26 +0000
Message-ID: <4B6A96B0.20707@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:43:12 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
To: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
References: <20100130143437.BBE563A683B@core3.amsl.com> <9abf48a61001300646g712fe589uceff1033063c71cd@mail.gmail.com> <4B6984EC.1040807@aegee.org> <4B6989FA.6080206@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <6c9fcc2a1002031318l3b5afddoa895e292fadb0ff6@mail.gmail.com> <01NJ8NX41PDW004042@mauve.mrochek.com> <4B6A8808.2050906@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
In-Reply-To: <4B6A8808.2050906@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: sieve@ietf.org, Ned Freed <ned.freed@mrochek.com>, Barry Leiba <barryleiba.mailing.lists@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [sieve] New Version Notification for draft-george-sieve-vacation-time-00
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sieve>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2010 09:42:42 -0000

Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:

> On 02/04/2010 04:58 AM, Ned Freed wrote:
>
>> The bottom line is that this is a can of worms I'd really rather not 
>> open.
>
> AOL. But if the main vacation specification were to be updated (fix 
> errata, proceed to draft, what have you), I'd be happy to see a 
> sentence like this:
>
> "If the sieve processor recognises an address belonging to the sieve 
> script's owner in the To or Cc fields, then it's better to use that 
> address for the vacation reply than any other addresses the script 
> owner may also have."
>
> I think that's what my code does, so evidently I thought this 
> behaviour permitted by the existing RFC. But I wouldn't mind saying it 
> explicitly.

My code does the same.

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status