Re: [sieve] On "reject" and :fcc

Sebastian Hagedorn <Hagedorn@uni-koeln.de> Wed, 18 January 2017 09:06 UTC

Return-Path: <Hagedorn@uni-koeln.de>
X-Original-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sieve@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA9F31293E8 for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:06:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=uni-koeln.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mr0Nz_WgT1DS for <sieve@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:06:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out-v1.uni-koeln.de (mail-out-v1.uni-koeln.de [IPv6:2a00:a200:0:13::58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4750128B44 for <sieve@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 01:06:07 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=uni-koeln.de; i=@uni-koeln.de; q=dns/txt; s=2016; t=1484730368; x=1516266368; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=x2TIewEUZqFMKAX8iMlDIQQep75DyFI6lySJSuul+i4=; b=qZGAPkyGEukW/ncf/4eVyYHySLQjPAEWp7vYQ3RHjLFVx0r6piVwzQY5 FaQkTA0NBKv4FRtAFOeFSy3i5AxB0AY/f+CFj4XEYT+qF+va+3MpB7VRl q1LtvjciKILgFi0ye/B8JCsQDXItSKDbhniZdRb03gyci5hFCOZnzgkU+ 5WHnaTI6d9P68mVj6tFb1JRqq3d5rfWL3jhis7pnO6+dgoYpGblQCko8g MvH6GhZXTBVZF/+fxtARytpTydVlEXk1hEwtNBsC1N1AIvGFEMUMhO/L9 5ZPaZQXfOurr1kC7xz1EorFSvE8fLvcTXfixVsZRUriXQpgEOzqEcq+kW A==;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A+ByBAAhL39Y/wCiACoSACVcGgEBAQECA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQgBAQEBgxApAQEBAQEfUIEYg1GKepEelzeGIgKBZkIVAQIBAQEBAQEBYyi?= =?us-ascii?q?EagEEASMVQRALGgImAgJXGYh7CAGvNYIliioBAQEBBgEBAQEBASKBC4ohhCsBA?= =?us-ascii?q?RtMgjotgjEFmyIbPYISjxKKIAqGQ5JuNSKBJx6FBRyBYXKGTIIuAQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,248,1477954800"; d="scan'208";a="7025732"
Received: from smtp-out.rrz.uni-koeln.de ([IPv6:2a00:a200:0:12::25]) by mail-out-v1.uni-koeln.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Jan 2017 10:06:05 +0100
Received: from smtp.uni-koeln.de (milter2-neu.rrz.uni-koeln.de [IPv6:2a00:a200:0:15::27] (may be forged)) by smtp-out.rrz.uni-koeln.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0I964Io019494; Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:06:04 +0100
Received: from tyrion.rrz.uni-koeln.de (tyrion.rrz.uni-koeln.de [134.95.128.1]) by smtp.uni-koeln.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id v0I963AA013944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:06:04 +0100
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 10:06:03 +0100
From: Sebastian Hagedorn <Hagedorn@uni-koeln.de>
To: NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com
Message-ID: <012499BC3A68B6D107DF9613@tyrion.rrz.uni-koeln.de>
In-Reply-To: <01Q9SPQ6F0W000004H@mauve.mrochek.com>
References: <1484691459.1802986.850940944.17135021@webmail.messagingengine.com> <01Q9SN4A5CB400004H@mauve.mrochek.com> <1484695748.520887.851011408.2EB11064@webmail.messagingengine.com> <01Q9SP1R5AP200004H@mauve.mrochek.com> <1484698881.2689745.851047760.743150E6@webmail.messagingengine.com> <01Q9SPQ6F0W000004H@mauve.mrochek.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a3 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline; size=1030
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sieve/kUcT0JHuwEmV489PVRwBa8RQLP0>
Cc: sieve@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sieve] On "reject" and :fcc
X-BeenThere: sieve@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIEVE Working Group <sieve.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sieve/>
List-Post: <mailto:sieve@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sieve>, <mailto:sieve-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 09:06:10 -0000

--On 17. Januar 2017 um 16:24:12 -0800 NED+mta-filters@mauve.mrochek.com 
wrote:

>> Sometimes you want to keep the junk that was sent to you while saying to
>> the sender that nobody got that message.  Making that hard within the
>> standard will just cause people to work around it by doing things like
>> capturing all mail that hits the MXes before sieve processes it.  Not
>> providing a facility because it can be used to lie doesn't change that.
>
> As I said before, if you really think it's perfectly OK to provide a
> mechanism to your users that allows them to instruct the system to lie in
> an offical system message about them not having gotten the content of a
> mail message, then we have nothing further to talk about.

For the record, I agree with Bron on this. It's up to the users if they 
want to lie.
-- 
    .:.Sebastian Hagedorn - Weyertal 121 (Gebäude 133), Zimmer 2.02.:.
                 .:.Regionales Rechenzentrum (RRZK).:.
   .:.Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - ✆ +49-221-470-89578.:.