Re: [sip-clf] draft CLF charter

[Robert Sparks <[e-mail]>]

Just to make sure we are all on the same page:

On Jul 21, 2009, at 5:25 PM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote:

> Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
>> A few comments after the first reading of the charter.
>
> Dan: Thanks for your feedback; more inline.
>
>> - Is it Common Log File as it appears at the first instance, or  
>> Common
>> Log Format?
>
> CLF expands to Common Log File, though colloquially you will
> see references to "the CLF format", which simply means the
> specific fields and their representation.

This is something we need to state more clearly.

Are we defining a file are we defining a format that might go in a file?

I think the proposals I've read so far are trying to do the second.
Does anyone disagree?

I was planning to  change the word File Dan is pointing  to in the
proposed charter to Format.

RjS