Re: [sip-clf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipclf-format-06.txt

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Mon, 02 April 2012 15:06 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7948C21F85C3 for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HBMMLCgZ2zit for <sip-clf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B665C21F857F for <sip-clf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 08:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.9]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id q32F6DPD021671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:06:13 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail-ce2.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.63]) by usnavsmail1.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id q32F6CD5031439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:06:13 -0500
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.238.235]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id q32F6Bi4003094; Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:06:11 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4F79C188.2040400@bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 10:11:04 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120209 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Musgrave <musgravepj@gmail.com>
References: <20120312191323.25429.64464.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5EECD580-7FB7-41ED-A2CB-85100181A36D@cisco.com> <5761D2B4-AF1F-4FB9-9357-C3BF847B6CA8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5761D2B4-AF1F-4FB9-9357-C3BF847B6CA8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.9
Cc: "sip-clf@ietf.org Mailing" <sip-clf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sip-clf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sipclf-format-06.txt
X-BeenThere: sip-clf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Common Log File format discussion list <sip-clf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sip-clf>
List-Post: <mailto:sip-clf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip-clf>, <mailto:sip-clf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 15:06:24 -0000

On 04/01/2012 01:09 PM, Peter Musgrave wrote:
> Hi Robert, Gozallo, Vijay
>
> I have read the diffs in the document and think this is in good shape.

Peter: Thank you for going through the updated drafts.

> Do we feel that a final WGLC is needed for any of these changes - or
> should I go ahead and do the writeup for IESG?

I will leave that question to the chairs and AD to decide.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/