Re: [Sip] Toward the Evolution of SIP and Related Working Groups

[Dean Willis <[e-mail]>]

On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:23 PM, Hadriel Kaplan wrote:

> [fixed subject title, since I apparently broke it]
>
> How about a compromise: 2 WG's of 2-hour meetings each (since  
> today's SIP WG actually takes 2 of 2-hour meeting slots I think).
> One for the general SIP stuff as today, and one for "SIP Security".

  Ah yes, two eternal working groups to replace one.

> The new security group would take such things as:
> draft-ietf-sip-dtls-srtp-framework

-- This one is arguably done, depending on what we believe about RFC  
4474 and gateways/b2buas.

>
> draft-ietf-sip-eku

-- EKU is basically done.

>
> draft-ietf-sip-media-security-requirements

-- This one is done

>
> draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy

-- This one is done,

>
> draft-ietf-sip-domain-certs

-- This one is done

>
> draft-ietf-sip-e2m-sec

-- This one is done

>
> draft-ietf-sip-saml
-- I'm not sure this one is ever getting done.

So I'm not sure there's enough there to justify a WG.

How about an "Identity in SIP" working group that takes on fixing RFC  
4474 for gateways/b2buas and possibly considers identity/role  
assertion using SAML?

--
Dean

_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [e-mail] for questions on current sip
Use [e-mail] for new developments on the application of sip