Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sipcore-reason-q850-loc-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Wed, 20 March 2019 02:21 UTC
Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9973D12D4F3; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0RTQfpPFWBSt; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A886A128B01; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 19:21:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bens-macbook.lan (cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x2K2L1sD016640 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 21:21:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1553048468; bh=ECP21jk3sSDIKu6M3XweYvXhFT33CprlDxPBoyzlxRQ=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=fHWBgfHHsfZqmaY7R0s7aKG37CQR2UC85sMZrLYXYBNYomwBsORG1/rmtu2DbWSjx RNNghDUyF9rTkdi1mE/TFs+EA4oFp52oiJRAVCbFHbbzKd4ImBTQsEGrPr6XOnRiT4 ZLqfYYZJLTs1KGmN7Y9btuO3PDivr37MJum4Mcns=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host cpe-66-25-20-105.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.20.105] claimed to be bens-macbook.lan
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Message-Id: <623C7EE8-05D6-4BD6-98AA-1B5750EB522D@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_8C9FA427-A65B-47F0-B880-5C700DBBD234"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 21:20:55 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1e95f0cf-3e09-44ac-b2e8-401dbdd38581@nostrum.com>
Cc: R.Jesske@telekom.de, iesg@ietf.org, br@brianrosen.net, draft-ietf-sipcore-reason-q850-loc@ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org, sipcore-chairs@ietf.org
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
References: <155176292818.5224.17119790703710957363.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FRXPR01MB0135647633102FC4CC8E04B3F9480@FRXPR01MB0135.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE> <b192d655-4850-2f41-b993-33abb22ff145@nostrum.com> <4c7cd81c-7f4c-b893-3c55-618fe26f4836@nostrum.com> <1e95f0cf-3e09-44ac-b2e8-401dbdd38581@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/2yMDpFd61jpLWhk3__QZlyHViFQ>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sipcore-reason-q850-loc-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 02:21:14 -0000
> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:43 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote: > > On 3/15/19 1:28 PM, Adam Roach wrote: >> On 3/15/19 1:23 PM, Adam Roach wrote: >>> On 3/11/19 3:23 AM, R.Jesske@telekom.de wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> Thank you for your comments. I went through the comments and here are my answers and proposals to the comments made. >>>> Sorry If some of you get the mail twice, since I answered in another way already. >>>> >>>> 1. Discuss: >>>> §4 ABNF >>>> Have incorporated the proposal. >>> >>> >>> I'm going to clear my discuss >>> >> >> Based on Paul Kyzivat's comment on the SIPCORE mailing list, I'm going to hold off and talk to Ben before I clear. Sorry for the confusion. >> > > Based on Paul's comment and on Ben's reminder that SIP fields are generally case-insensitive (both on the SIPCORE mailing list), I think the solution here is to simply remove all of the instances of "%s" in the BNF I sent. Sorry for the extra round-trip here. > Like the following? If so, I can drop this into an RFC Editor note: OLD: reason-extension =/ isup-cause-location isup-cause-location = "location" EQUAL isup-location-value isup-location-value = %s"U" / ; for 0 0 0 0 user %s"LPN" / ; for 0 0 0 1 private network serving the local user %s"LN" / ; for 0 0 1 0 public network serving the local user %s"TN" / ; for 0 0 1 1 transit network %s"RLN" / ; for 0 1 0 0 public network serving the remote user %s"RPN" / ; for 0 1 0 1 private network serving the remote user %s"LOC-6" / ; for 0 1 1 0 spare %s"INTL" / ; for 0 1 1 1 international network %s"LOC-8" / ; for 1 0 0 0 spare %s"LOC-9" / ; for 1 0 0 1 spare %s"BI" / ; for 1 0 1 0 network beyond interworking point %s"LOC-11" / ; for 1 0 1 1 spare %s"LOC-12" / ; for 1 1 0 0 reserved for national use %s"LOC-13" / ; for 1 1 0 1 reserved for national use %s"LOC-14" / ; for 1 1 1 0 reserved for national use %s"LOC-15" ; for 1 1 1 1 reserved for national use Figure 1: isup-cause-location NEW: reason-extension =/ isup-cause-location isup-cause-location = "location" EQUAL isup-location-value isup-location-value = "U" / ; for 0 0 0 0 user "LPN" / ; for 0 0 0 1 private network serving the local user "LN" / ; for 0 0 1 0 public network serving the local user "TN" / ; for 0 0 1 1 transit network "RLN" / ; for 0 1 0 0 public network serving the remote user "RPN" / ; for 0 1 0 1 private network serving the remote user "LOC-6" / ; for 0 1 1 0 spare "INTL" / ; for 0 1 1 1 international network "LOC-8" / ; for 1 0 0 0 spare "LOC-9" / ; for 1 0 0 1 spare "BI" / ; for 1 0 1 0 network beyond interworking point "LOC-11" / ; for 1 0 1 1 spare "LOC-12" / ; for 1 1 0 0 reserved for national use "LOC-13" / ; for 1 1 0 1 reserved for national use "LOC-14" / ; for 1 1 1 0 reserved for national use "LOC-15" ; for 1 1 1 1 reserved for national use Figure 1: isup-cause-location
- [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sipc… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… R.Jesske
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… R.Jesske
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach