Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sipcore-reason-q850-loc-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 20 March 2019 03:05 UTC
Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BDF130EDB for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s76hmhzTxkFt for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E317A12787D for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x2K35qpd023990 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:05:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1553051156; bh=y62a81IH4U9LquMsJrR+ySh4mt+KapgpE0NDmUixtmw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hxUHMZ0lDIE8h0QMPJmlY2bve6f5anuNwLisHCKUft+KdgiIvX73EWjUImhUNSJcM 3XYpJ0MfplBOpPeWN7pDTUPLPDXuyq3Og3/m671brcLQwCsyELkTzKU1FCka6z7YuB SaLZnSz2tSx97L/OWCNLxUe1rMzquXmkYfPGY7og=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Cc: R.Jesske@telekom.de, iesg@ietf.org, br@brianrosen.net, draft-ietf-sipcore-reason-q850-loc@ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org, sipcore-chairs@ietf.org
References: <155176292818.5224.17119790703710957363.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FRXPR01MB0135647633102FC4CC8E04B3F9480@FRXPR01MB0135.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE> <b192d655-4850-2f41-b993-33abb22ff145@nostrum.com> <4c7cd81c-7f4c-b893-3c55-618fe26f4836@nostrum.com> <1e95f0cf-3e09-44ac-b2e8-401dbdd38581@nostrum.com> <623C7EE8-05D6-4BD6-98AA-1B5750EB522D@nostrum.com> <DB0CB406-B31A-4D6F-A66A-CFA6A67AA622@nostrum.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <9a35b1cb-ab25-9375-2c51-dd10a66a5a39@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:05:46 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DB0CB406-B31A-4D6F-A66A-CFA6A67AA622@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1B6893A21F427FAD1CAE149D"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/JEIzAeNNYAuTthOjZ2-vOMRnOx8>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sipcore-reason-q850-loc-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 03:05:58 -0000
The double-quotes are fine. Your RFC editor note addresses my issue completely. Clearing my discuss now. /a On 3/19/19 9:26 PM, Ben Campbell wrote: > > >> On Mar 19, 2019, at 9:20 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com >> <mailto:ben@nostrum.com>> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:43 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com >>> <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>> wrote: >>> >>> On 3/15/19 1:28 PM, Adam Roach wrote: >>>> On 3/15/19 1:23 PM, Adam Roach wrote: >>>>> On 3/11/19 3:23 AM,R.Jesske@telekom.de >>>>> <mailto:R.Jesske@telekom.de>wrote: >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> Thank you for your comments. I went through the comments and here >>>>>> are my answers and proposals to the comments made. >>>>>> Sorry If some of you get the mail twice, since I answered in >>>>>> another way already. >>>>>> >>>>>> 1. Discuss: >>>>>> §4 ABNF >>>>>> Have incorporated the proposal. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'm going to clear my discuss >>>>> >>>> >>>> Based on Paul Kyzivat's comment on the SIPCORE mailing list, I'm >>>> going to hold off and talk to Ben before I clear. Sorry for the >>>> confusion. >>>> >>> >>> Based on Paul's comment and on Ben's reminder that SIP fields are >>> generally case-insensitive (both on the SIPCORE mailing list), I >>> think the solution here is to simply remove all of the instances of >>> "%s" in the BNF I sent. Sorry for the extra round-trip here. >>> >> >> Like the following? If so, I can drop this into an RFC Editor note: > > Or do we also need to remove the double-quotes? > >> >> OLD: >> reason-extension =/ isup-cause-location >> isup-cause-location = "location" EQUAL isup-location-value >> >> isup-location-value = >> %s"U" / ; for 0 0 0 0 user >> %s"LPN" / ; for 0 0 0 1 private network serving the local user >> %s"LN" / ; for 0 0 1 0 public network serving the local user >> %s"TN" / ; for 0 0 1 1 transit network >> %s"RLN" / ; for 0 1 0 0 public network serving the remote user >> %s"RPN" / ; for 0 1 0 1 private network serving the remote user >> %s"LOC-6" / ; for 0 1 1 0 spare >> %s"INTL" / ; for 0 1 1 1 international network >> %s"LOC-8" / ; for 1 0 0 0 spare >> %s"LOC-9" / ; for 1 0 0 1 spare >> %s"BI" / ; for 1 0 1 0 network beyond interworking point >> %s"LOC-11" / ; for 1 0 1 1 spare >> %s"LOC-12" / ; for 1 1 0 0 reserved for national use >> %s"LOC-13" / ; for 1 1 0 1 reserved for national use >> %s"LOC-14" / ; for 1 1 1 0 reserved for national use >> %s"LOC-15" ; for 1 1 1 1 reserved for national use >> >> Figure 1: isup-cause-location >> NEW: >> reason-extension =/ isup-cause-location >> isup-cause-location = "location" EQUAL isup-location-value >> >> isup-location-value = >> "U" / ; for 0 0 0 0 user >> "LPN" / ; for 0 0 0 1 private network serving the local user >> "LN" / ; for 0 0 1 0 public network serving the local user >> "TN" / ; for 0 0 1 1 transit network >> "RLN" / ; for 0 1 0 0 public network serving the remote user >> "RPN" / ; for 0 1 0 1 private network serving the remote user >> "LOC-6" / ; for 0 1 1 0 spare >> "INTL" / ; for 0 1 1 1 international network >> "LOC-8" / ; for 1 0 0 0 spare >> "LOC-9" / ; for 1 0 0 1 spare >> "BI" / ; for 1 0 1 0 network beyond interworking point >> "LOC-11" / ; for 1 0 1 1 spare >> "LOC-12" / ; for 1 1 0 0 reserved for national use >> "LOC-13" / ; for 1 1 0 1 reserved for national use >> "LOC-14" / ; for 1 1 1 0 reserved for national use >> "LOC-15" ; for 1 1 1 1 reserved for national use >> >> Figure 1: isup-cause-location >
- [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sipc… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… R.Jesske
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… R.Jesske
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Ben Campbell
- Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Adam Roach