Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sipcore-reason-q850-loc-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 20 March 2019 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BDF130EDB for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:05:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.679
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s76hmhzTxkFt for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:05:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E317A12787D for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 20:05:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MacBook-Pro.roach.at (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x2K35qpd023990 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:05:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1553051156; bh=y62a81IH4U9LquMsJrR+ySh4mt+KapgpE0NDmUixtmw=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=hxUHMZ0lDIE8h0QMPJmlY2bve6f5anuNwLisHCKUft+KdgiIvX73EWjUImhUNSJcM 3XYpJ0MfplBOpPeWN7pDTUPLPDXuyq3Og3/m671brcLQwCsyELkTzKU1FCka6z7YuB SaLZnSz2tSx97L/OWCNLxUe1rMzquXmkYfPGY7og=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be MacBook-Pro.roach.at
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Cc: R.Jesske@telekom.de, iesg@ietf.org, br@brianrosen.net, draft-ietf-sipcore-reason-q850-loc@ietf.org, sipcore@ietf.org, sipcore-chairs@ietf.org
References: <155176292818.5224.17119790703710957363.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FRXPR01MB0135647633102FC4CC8E04B3F9480@FRXPR01MB0135.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE> <b192d655-4850-2f41-b993-33abb22ff145@nostrum.com> <4c7cd81c-7f4c-b893-3c55-618fe26f4836@nostrum.com> <1e95f0cf-3e09-44ac-b2e8-401dbdd38581@nostrum.com> <623C7EE8-05D6-4BD6-98AA-1B5750EB522D@nostrum.com> <DB0CB406-B31A-4D6F-A66A-CFA6A67AA622@nostrum.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <9a35b1cb-ab25-9375-2c51-dd10a66a5a39@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 22:05:46 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <DB0CB406-B31A-4D6F-A66A-CFA6A67AA622@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------1B6893A21F427FAD1CAE149D"
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/JEIzAeNNYAuTthOjZ2-vOMRnOx8>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Adam Roach's Discuss on draft-ietf-sipcore-reason-q850-loc-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 03:05:58 -0000

The double-quotes are fine. Your RFC editor note addresses my issue 
completely. Clearing my discuss now.

/a

On 3/19/19 9:26 PM, Ben Campbell wrote:
>
>
>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 9:20 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com 
>> <mailto:ben@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Mar 19, 2019, at 1:43 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com 
>>> <mailto:adam@nostrum.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 3/15/19 1:28 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
>>>> On 3/15/19 1:23 PM, Adam Roach wrote:
>>>>> On 3/11/19 3:23 AM,R.Jesske@telekom.de 
>>>>> <mailto:R.Jesske@telekom.de>wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> Thank you for your comments. I went through the comments and here 
>>>>>> are my answers and proposals to the comments made.
>>>>>> Sorry If some of you get the mail twice, since I answered in 
>>>>>> another way already.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.  Discuss:
>>>>>> §4 ABNF
>>>>>> Have incorporated the proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to clear my discuss
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Based on Paul Kyzivat's comment on the SIPCORE mailing list, I'm 
>>>> going to hold off and talk to Ben before I clear. Sorry for the 
>>>> confusion.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Based on Paul's comment and on Ben's reminder that SIP fields are 
>>> generally case-insensitive (both on the SIPCORE mailing list), I 
>>> think the solution here is to simply remove all of the instances of 
>>> "%s" in the BNF I sent. Sorry for the extra round-trip here.
>>>
>>
>> Like the following? If so, I can drop this into an RFC Editor note:
>
> Or do we also need to remove the double-quotes?
>
>>
>> OLD:
>> reason-extension =/ isup-cause-location
>> isup-cause-location =  "location" EQUAL isup-location-value
>>
>>     isup-location-value =
>>        %s"U" /      ; for 0 0 0 0 user
>>        %s"LPN" /    ; for 0 0 0 1 private network serving the local user
>>        %s"LN" /     ; for 0 0 1 0 public network serving the local user
>>        %s"TN" /     ; for 0 0 1 1 transit network
>>        %s"RLN" /    ; for 0 1 0 0 public network serving the remote user
>>        %s"RPN" /    ; for 0 1 0 1 private network serving the remote user
>>        %s"LOC-6" /  ; for 0 1 1 0 spare
>>        %s"INTL" /   ; for 0 1 1 1 international network
>>        %s"LOC-8" /  ; for 1 0 0 0 spare
>>        %s"LOC-9" /  ; for 1 0 0 1 spare
>>        %s"BI" /     ; for 1 0 1 0 network beyond interworking point
>>        %s"LOC-11" / ; for 1 0 1 1 spare
>>        %s"LOC-12" / ; for 1 1 0 0 reserved for national use
>>        %s"LOC-13" / ; for 1 1 0 1 reserved for national use
>>        %s"LOC-14" / ; for 1 1 1 0 reserved for national use
>>        %s"LOC-15"   ; for 1 1 1 1 reserved for national use
>>
>>                         Figure 1: isup-cause-location
>> NEW:
>> reason-extension =/ isup-cause-location
>> isup-cause-location =  "location" EQUAL isup-location-value
>>
>>     isup-location-value =
>>        "U" /      ; for 0 0 0 0 user
>>        "LPN" /    ; for 0 0 0 1 private network serving the local user
>>        "LN" /     ; for 0 0 1 0 public network serving the local user
>>        "TN" /     ; for 0 0 1 1 transit network
>>        "RLN" /    ; for 0 1 0 0 public network serving the remote user
>>        "RPN" /    ; for 0 1 0 1 private network serving the remote user
>>        "LOC-6" /  ; for 0 1 1 0 spare
>>        "INTL" /   ; for 0 1 1 1 international network
>>        "LOC-8" /  ; for 1 0 0 0 spare
>>        "LOC-9" /  ; for 1 0 0 1 spare
>>        "BI" /     ; for 1 0 1 0 network beyond interworking point
>>        "LOC-11" / ; for 1 0 1 1 spare
>>        "LOC-12" / ; for 1 1 0 0 reserved for national use
>>        "LOC-13" / ; for 1 1 0 1 reserved for national use
>>        "LOC-14" / ; for 1 1 1 0 reserved for national use
>>        "LOC-15"   ; for 1 1 1 1 reserved for national use
>>
>>                         Figure 1: isup-cause-location
>