IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] RESPONSE REQUESTED: SIPCORE work and milestones

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Wed, 21 December 2016 04:53 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9A4129460 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:53:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.622
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.622 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t4-yzYWVvu5w for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8D2112945B for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:53:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3166; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1482295985; x=1483505585; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=QiIEVcggf8VRrZQYbZvyYiCvDjT8iVaeTtK6cITllFM=; b=jW5yqZbqeHBJ2SBQBiUaycOcP6up+sh46bl+bjS/qm3Z0zaQ9hY1Xh/h phCtoT26W3wS7JEYwVipTK80OP7kqFvrzBsFuin8X5M1Ec7/sMWeL23fm QxWeEHpZDCBt/NumuH/HCezdLC/Ks0/iY2tCmHelSL9lwtQm/IdrFsnmK M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AVAQCCClpY/5FdJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgzYBAQEBAR9agQYHjUmWWZUOggofC4UuSgIagVA/FAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGgBAQEDAQEBEBEROgIJBQsCAQgYAgImAgICJQsVEAIEDgUiiEEIDplnAY12giiLFAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARgFgQuFK4F9glyEIwEBG4MELYIwBY8Bi28BkTOBdIUDiVaOGoQOAR83gSYsDwGFSnIBhliBIYENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,381,1477958400"; d="scan'208";a="187952988"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Dec 2016 04:52:43 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (xch-rcd-009.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uBL4qhBD008775 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:52:43 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:52:42 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 22:52:42 -0600
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Thread-Topic: [sipcore] RESPONSE REQUESTED: SIPCORE work and milestones
Thread-Index: AQHSWv95G6VmhE95f0GNmphVO/F+2aESOrYA
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:52:42 +0000
Message-ID: <0C597C24-AE5C-4E3F-BD19-569B20B0AC62@cisco.com>
References: <e42393d8-9ddb-78ba-78fe-34f04f6d672d@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <e42393d8-9ddb-78ba-78fe-34f04f6d672d@nostrum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.226.176]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <CDD0E10F8AD4634A98C4E3A1E13E0EE1@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sipcore/7vAnhxIM1aHJhXp9iOihl0vVTWA>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, SIPCORE <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] RESPONSE REQUESTED: SIPCORE work and milestones
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sipcore/>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 04:53:08 -0000

Considering that we already agreed in Berlin to take on "Happy Eyeballs for SIP” as a milestone, I think that should be prioritized.  We are obviously willing to work on this and have already put forth a candidate draft to satisfy this milestone (draft-worley-sip-he-connection) that we’re hoping the WG will consider for adoption.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

> On Dec 20, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> [as chair]
> 
> Now that we have our new charter approved, I'd like the working group to have a discussion about the specific work items that we should take on in the short- to medium-term so that we can revise our milestones appropriately. Based on recent discussions on the mailing list, the following topics have some mind-share behind them. What I'd like from everyone with an interest in any of these topics is to indicate (a) whether you are willing to actively review and comment on documents on the topic; and (b) what priority each task has relative to each other: there are five topics; please indicate a unique priority from one (most important) to five (least important) for each topic.
> 
> 	• "Happy Eyeballs for SIP" (aka Happy Earballs), currently under discussion on the list.
> 	• "DTLS Transport for SIP", as proposed by Tolga Asveren's recent messages.
> 	• A mechanism for labeling the nature of SIP calls, with <draft-schulzrinne-sipcore-callinfo-spam> as a likely candidate draft.
> 	• Fixing Content-ID in SIP, as discussed in <https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore/current/msg07245.html>, with <draft-holmberg-sipcore-content-id> as a likely candidate draft.
> 	• Clarifications around SIP name-addr, with <draft-sparks-sipcore-name-addr-guidance> as a likely candidate draft
> 
> I will also note that we have already declared consensus on adopting <draft-ietf-sipcore-status-unwanted> as a WG document, and will be adding an associated milestone. I want to take this opportunity to remind people that the document is in WGLC, and your comments are strongly encouraged, the earlier the better.
> 
> Please respond before the end of 2016. Thanks!
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> /a
> _______________________________________________
> sipcore mailing list
> sipcore@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email