IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sipcore] Proposal for a new SIP transport (WebSocket)

Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org> Tue, 15 November 2011 10:25 UTC

Return-Path: <petithug@acm.org>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D8B11E8220 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:25:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.459
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.459 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2yV2y-PNqYSj for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:25:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from implementers.org (implementers.org [IPv6:2604:3400:dc1:41:216:3eff:fe5b:8240]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1778A11E81FA for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:25:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8:0:64:ca0a:a9ff:fe2e:a4f6] (unknown [IPv6:2001:df8:0:64:ca0a:a9ff:fe2e:a4f6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "petithug", Issuer "implementers.org" (verified OK)) by implementers.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D16120375; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:16:11 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4EC23E2A.8090900@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:25:46 +0800
From: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111114 Icedove/3.1.16
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
References: <CALiegf=_8GuvEHPR=rFA3Urtj0WxzRFQ4W=_dxkCDKZMbHL_aw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=pRjgBUpLxm3e7CopwSrS8e9BekKdF5ZZEW04S29-XnA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTXFp8Gba+h7V7B8uE5a55ZBQOEOd2_yoT8b=+2247RZeUK1Q@mail.gmail.com> <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC0982D3F4D40@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com> <CALiegf=UAQCD4MR886BYVon_uV=-985eKL_5t1aOL-=s0bvFJQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALiegf=UAQCD4MR886BYVon_uV=-985eKL_5t1aOL-=s0bvFJQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>, "Avasarala, Ranjit" <Ranjit.Avasarala@polycom.com>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Proposal for a new SIP transport (WebSocket)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:25:55 -0000

On 11/15/2011 06:18 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote:
> 2011/11/15 Avasarala, Ranjit <Ranjit.Avasarala@polycom.com>:
>> One comment - the proposal of SIP as a new WebSocket sub protocol is not very clear in ur draft. So you could add an example for it.
>> E.g.  Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: sip  (is this what you intend to propose?).
>>
>> Also add a section on how SIP as a WebSocket sub protocol is negotiated as part of client/server handshake procedure.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> AFAIK there is not yet a official registry for WebSocket subprotocols.
> We could propose it anyway in the draft. We'll address it.

http://www.iana.org/assignments/websocket/websocket.xml#subprotocol-name

-- 
Marc Petit-Huguenin
Personal email: marc@petit-huguenin.org
Professional email: petithug@acm.org
Blog: http://blog.marc.petit-huguenin.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email