Re: [sipcore] Proposal for a new SIP transport (WebSocket)

Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net> Tue, 15 November 2011 10:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ibc@aliax.net>
X-Original-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1875121F8F40 for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:18:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QESxMdOMyrYt for <sipcore@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F4021F8F3F for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by vws5 with SMTP id 5so7283148vws.31 for <sipcore@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.52.65.36 with SMTP id u4mr41526032vds.58.1321352331055; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:18:51 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.107.206 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 02:18:30 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC0982D3F4D40@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com>
References: <CALiegf=_8GuvEHPR=rFA3Urtj0WxzRFQ4W=_dxkCDKZMbHL_aw@mail.gmail.com> <CALiegf=pRjgBUpLxm3e7CopwSrS8e9BekKdF5ZZEW04S29-XnA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGTXFp8Gba+h7V7B8uE5a55ZBQOEOd2_yoT8b=+2247RZeUK1Q@mail.gmail.com> <1F2A2C70609D9E41844A2126145FC0982D3F4D40@HKGMBOXPRD22.polycom.com>
From: Iñaki Baz Castillo <ibc@aliax.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:18:30 +0100
Message-ID: <CALiegf=UAQCD4MR886BYVon_uV=-985eKL_5t1aOL-=s0bvFJQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Avasarala, Ranjit" <Ranjit.Avasarala@polycom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "SIPCORE (Session Initiation Protocol Core) WG" <sipcore@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [sipcore] Proposal for a new SIP transport (WebSocket)
X-BeenThere: sipcore@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: SIP Core Working Group <sipcore.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sipcore>
List-Post: <mailto:sipcore@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sipcore>, <mailto:sipcore-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:18:52 -0000

2011/11/15 Avasarala, Ranjit <Ranjit.Avasarala@polycom.com>:
> One comment - the proposal of SIP as a new WebSocket sub protocol is not very clear in ur draft. So you could add an example for it.
> E.g.  Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: sip  (is this what you intend to propose?).
>
> Also add a section on how SIP as a WebSocket sub protocol is negotiated as part of client/server handshake procedure.

Hi,

AFAIK there is not yet a official registry for WebSocket subprotocols.
We could propose it anyway in the draft. We'll address it.

Thanks a lot.

-- 
Iñaki Baz Castillo
<ibc@aliax.net>